Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

08:11
Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies
Published on: January 19, 2021
7.7K
A Comparative Analysis of Honeypots on Different Cloud Platforms.
Christopher Kelly1, Nikolaos Pitropakis1,2, Alexios Mylonas3
1School of Computing Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 30, 2021
Summary
Cloud security threats are diverse across major providers like AWS, GCP, and Azure. Analysis of honeypot data reveals attackers target popular remote work services, originating from expected and unexpected global locations.
Area of Science:
- Cybersecurity
- Cloud Computing Security
- Network Security
Background:
- Cloud computing adoption is widespread, with cloud data centers processing most workloads.
- Storing vast amounts of private and personal data in the cloud raises significant security concerns.
- Understanding adversarial activities is crucial for cloud infrastructure protection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To monitor and analyze adversarial activities targeting major cloud platforms.
- To compare the nature, volume, and origin of attacks across different cloud providers.
- To identify targeted services and vulnerabilities exploited by threat actors.
Main Methods:
- Deployment of multiple honeypots across Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft Azure in various regions.
- Collection and comparative analysis of security logs over a three-week period in May 2020.
- Visualization of collected data to identify patterns in adversarial behavior.
Main Results:
- Heterogeneous attacker activity observed across different cloud providers in terms of attack volume and origin.
- Threat actors targeted popular services, including remote desktop sharing, commonly used for remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Attacks originated from both commonly identified sources (China, Russia, US) and less common locations (Vietnam, India, Venezuela).
Conclusions:
- Cloud security threats vary significantly between major providers.
- Attackers exploit widely used services, highlighting the need for robust security measures for remote work infrastructure.
- Insights into adversarial activity can enhance organizational situational awareness and cloud security strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
4.1K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.1K
Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods
2.5K
In argentometric precipitation titrations, endpoints can be detected visually by the Mohr, Volhard, and Fajans methods. In the Mohr method, adding a soluble chromate indicator gives an initial yellow color to the analyte solution. As the titrant is added, the first excess of silver ions forms a red silver chromate precipitate, marking the endpoint. The solution pH should be maintained at about 8 by adding solid CaCO3.
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
2.5K

