Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning
Published on: July 22, 2025
Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach
Jonathan Moeyersons1, John Morales1, Nick Seeuws1
1STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Machine learning algorithms significantly improve the detection of noisy segments in ambulatory impedance pneumography for respiratory disease monitoring. These data-driven methods outperform traditional heuristic approaches in identifying clean bio-impedance signals.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Respiratory Medicine
- Signal Processing
Background:
- Ambulatory impedance pneumography is crucial for monitoring respiratory diseases.
- Noisy signals in ambulatory recordings can significantly impair data-driven decision support tools.
- Accurate identification and removal of artefacts are essential for reliable respiratory monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in distinguishing clean from noisy bio-impedance signals.
- To compare the performance of a heuristic algorithm, a Support Vector Machine (SVM), and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for artefact detection.
- To assess the added value of data-driven approaches in improving the quality of respiratory impedance data.
Main Methods:
- A dataset of 47 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients undergoing inspiratory threshold loading was used.
- Respiration was recorded simultaneously using a bio-impedance device and a spirometer (gold standard).
- Signals were annotated for artefacts by four experts based on the reference spirometer data. Three methods were compared: heuristic algorithm, SVM, and CNN.
Main Results:
- Both machine learning approaches (SVM and CNN) demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (87.77% ± 2.64% and 87.20% ± 2.78%, respectively) compared to the heuristic method (84.69% ± 2.32%).
- No significant performance difference was found between the SVM and CNN models.
- The area under the curve (AUC) for the feature-based (SVM) and neural network (CNN) models were 92.77% ± 2.95% and 92.51% ± 1.74%, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Data-driven approaches, specifically machine learning algorithms like SVM and CNN, are highly beneficial for artefact detection in respiratory thoracic bio-impedance signals.
- These advanced methods offer superior performance over traditional heuristic techniques for ensuring signal quality in ambulatory monitoring.
- The findings support the integration of machine learning for robust artefact removal, enhancing the reliability of respiratory monitoring systems.
More Related Videos
06:22Machine Learning-Based Cough Tone Classification: Diagnostic Exploration of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Respiratory Tract Infections
Published on: September 19, 2025
09:42Acquisition and Semi-Automated Analysis of Respiratory Muscle Surface Electromyography
Published on: January 24, 2025