Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CORTADO: hill climbing optimization for cell-type specific marker gene discovery and clustering accuracy improvement.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

Root Canal Disinfection in Primary Teeth: A Comparative Assessment of Visible Light Diode Laser and Ozonated Water.

International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry·2026
Same author

Deployment of a Tailored and Hybrid Educational Strategy for Wartime Capacity Building: American Association of Physicists in Medicine/Help Ukraine Group/Ukrainian Association of Medical Physicists Training Program to Transition Ukraine From Co-60 to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

JCO global oncology·2026
Same author

The C/EBPα-(PU.1-LOUP) regulatory circuit regulates monocyte/macrophage development and immune functions.

Blood·2026
Same author

Availability of multidisciplinary treatment modalities and outcomes among patients with resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

JNCI cancer spectrum·2025
Same author

Unraveling enteroendocrine cell lineage dynamics and associated gene regulatory networks during intestinal development.

Biology open·2025
Same journal

RETRACTED: Sabir et al. DNA Based and Stimuli-Responsive Smart Nanocarrier for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer: Applications and Challenges. <i>Cancers</i> 2021, <i>13</i>, 3396.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Adeluola et al. Chemoprevention of 4-NQO-Induced Oral Cancer by the Combination of Resveratrol and EGCG: In Vivo, In Silico and In Vitro Studies. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 1098.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Peñalver et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma-Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) 2026. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 395.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Accorsi Buttini et al. Development of a Simplified Geriatric Score-4 (SGS-4) to Predict Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged over 50. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3278.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Age-Stratified Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Stage IV Melanoma and NSCLC in The Netherlands: A Population-Based Study.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Targeting Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Cancers·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

15.6K

Multi-View Data Integration Methods for Radiotherapy Structure Name Standardization.

Khajamoinuddin Syed1, William C Sleeman1,2, Michael Hagan2,3

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.

Cancers
|April 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardizing radiotherapy structure names improves personalized treatment planning. Integrating multiple data types, like text labels and geometric information, enhances machine learning models for better big data analytics in radiation oncology.

Keywords:
TG-263image classificationmachine learningmulti-view data integrationradiotherapy structure namestext categorizationweighting techniques

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

1.6K
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

15.6K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

1.6K
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Oncology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Standardizing radiotherapy structure names is crucial for data-driven personalized treatment.
  • Existing methods often rely on a single data type, limiting model performance.
  • Radiotherapy structures involve diverse data: text labels, geometric information, and Dose-Volume Histograms (DVH).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel machine learning approaches for standardizing radiotherapy structure names.
  • To investigate the effectiveness of integrating complementary data views (textual and geometric) for improved standardization.
  • To enhance the foundation for big data analytics in radiation oncology.

Main Methods:

  • Two integration methods were developed: intermediate and late integration.
  • These methods combined physician-given textual structure names with geometric structure information.
  • The study utilized a large dataset from prostate and lung cancer patients across multiple radiotherapy centers.

Main Results:

  • The intermediate integration approach demonstrated superior performance compared to single-view models.
  • Late integration showed performance comparable to single-view methods.
  • The findings highlight the benefit of multi-view data integration for structure name standardization.

Conclusions:

  • Combining different data views significantly improves machine learning models for radiotherapy structure name standardization.
  • This approach facilitates more robust big data analytics in radiation oncology.
  • The developed methods pave the way for more accurate and personalized radiotherapy treatments.