Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

255
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
255
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

487
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
487
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.3K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.3K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

12.1K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
12.1K
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule01:10

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule

2.1K
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1  triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the...
2.1K
Vector Product (Cross Product)01:17

Vector Product (Cross Product)

23.8K
Vector multiplication of two vectors yields a vector product, with the magnitude equal to the product of the individual vectors multiplied by the sine of the angle between both the vectors and the direction perpendicular to both the individual vectors. As there are always two directions perpendicular to a given plane, one on each side, the direction of the vector product is governed by the right-hand thumb rule.
Consider the cross product of two vectors. Imagine rotating the first vector about...
23.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hierarchical Clustering via Single and Complete Linkage Using Fully Homomorphic Encryption.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Efficient <i>L</i><sub>p</sub> Distance Computation Using Function-Hiding Inner Product Encryption for Privacy-Preserving Anomaly Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Energy Trading on Blockchain Using Dual Binary Encoding for Inner Product Encryption.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.4K

Acceleration of Inner-Pairing Product Operation for Secure Biometric Verification.

Seong-Yun Jeon1, Mun-Kyu Lee1

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This article presents a new method to speed up secure biometric verification on remote servers. By optimizing complex mathematical operations used in functional encryption, the authors reduce the time needed for authentication. Their approach makes secure identity checks faster for smart devices.

Keywords:
biometric verificationfunctional encryptioninner-pairing productfunctional encryptioncryptographic securitysmart device authenticationcomputational efficiency

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Split-BioID &#8212; Proteomic Analysis of Context-specific Protein Complexes in Their Native Cellular Environment
09:02

Split-BioID — Proteomic Analysis of Context-specific Protein Complexes in Their Native Cellular Environment

Published on: April 20, 2018

20.1K
Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.4K
Split-BioID &#8212; Proteomic Analysis of Context-specific Protein Complexes in Their Native Cellular Environment
09:02

Split-BioID — Proteomic Analysis of Context-specific Protein Complexes in Their Native Cellular Environment

Published on: April 20, 2018

20.1K
Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cybersecurity and privacy research within inner-pairing product optimization
  • Biometric authentication systems engineering

Background:

Biometric verification is increasingly common for securing modern smart devices. Protecting sensitive user data remains a significant challenge for developers. Prior research has shown that storing templates in encrypted formats offers a viable security strategy. Functional encryption provides a framework for performing comparisons directly on encrypted data. However, this approach often demands heavy computational resources during the decryption phase. No prior work had resolved the performance bottleneck caused by the inner-pairing product operation. That uncertainty drove the need for more efficient mathematical processing techniques. This study addresses the latency issues inherent in current secure authentication protocols.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to accelerate the inner-pairing product operation for secure biometric verification. Current methods for protecting biometric templates often rely on functional encryption techniques. These techniques require substantial computational power during the decryption phase of the authentication process. The authors seek to address the latency drawbacks associated with these heavy mathematical demands. This gap motivated the development of a more efficient computational strategy. The researchers specifically target the inner-pairing product operation to expedite remote identity checks. They intend to provide a faster solution that maintains the security of stored biometric data. This work addresses the need for high-performance privacy-preserving authentication in smart devices.

Main Methods:

The researchers developed an enhanced mathematical approach to expedite the decryption phase of functional encryption. Their review approach involved analyzing the structure of the inner-pairing product operation. They identified that one argument remains constant across multiple authentication sessions. The team focused on evaluating the product of multiple pairings as a single unit. This strategy avoids the overhead associated with calculating individual pairings separately. The experimental design compared their new method against the previous best known technique. They measured the time required for computation to assess the efficiency gains. Finally, the authors evaluated the total impact on the speed of remote biometric verification.

Main Results:

The proposed method reduces the time required to compute an inner-pairing product by 30.7% compared to the previous best approach. This significant improvement directly accelerates the decryption operation within functional encryption frameworks. Consequently, the total time required for biometric verification decreases by up to 10.0% when compared to a naive implementation. These values confirm the effectiveness of the authors' mathematical optimizations. The results demonstrate that exploiting static arguments provides a tangible performance benefit. The data shows that the efficiency gains are consistent across the tested authentication scenarios. This reduction in latency is achieved without compromising the security of the encrypted templates. The findings validate the utility of their approach for real-world smart device applications.

Conclusions:

The authors demonstrate a successful strategy for enhancing the speed of secure biometric verification. Their findings indicate that optimizing the inner-pairing product operation yields measurable performance gains. This work confirms that leveraging static arguments in decryption can improve system efficiency. The researchers propose that their method offers a practical alternative to existing computational approaches. By reducing the time required for pairing products, the overall authentication process becomes faster. These results suggest that functional encryption can be more viable for resource-constrained devices. The study provides a clear path for future optimizations in secure remote verification. This synthesis highlights the balance between robust privacy protection and necessary computational speed.

The researchers propose an optimization strategy that leverages the observation that one argument in the decryption operation remains static across sessions. By calculating the product of multiple pairings simultaneously rather than individually, they achieve a 30.7% reduction in computation time for the inner-pairing product.

The authors utilize functional encryption, a cryptographic framework that allows biometric comparisons to be performed directly on ciphertext. This tool ensures that sensitive templates remain protected while enabling secure remote authentication on smart devices.

The researchers identify that evaluating the product of multiple pairings is more efficient than processing individual pairings. This technical necessity allows the system to bypass redundant calculations during the decryption phase of functional encryption.

The study relies on experimental data to validate the performance of their enhanced method. This quantitative approach allows the authors to compare their results against the previous best method to determine the exact percentage of speed improvement.

The authors measure the time required for the inner-pairing product operation and the total biometric verification process. They report a 30.7% reduction in the former and an up to 10.0% decrease in the latter compared to naive implementations.

The authors propose that their method makes secure remote biometric verification more practical for smart devices. They suggest that this improvement helps bridge the gap between high-security requirements and the need for fast user authentication.