Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Surgical Techniques for Catheter Placement and 5/6 Nephrectomy in Murine Models of Peritoneal Dialysis
Published on: July 19, 2018
Toxin Removal and Inflammatory State Modulation during Online Hemodiafiltration Using Two Different Dialyzers (TRIAD2
Gabriele Donati1, Maria Cappuccilli1, Chiara Donadei1
1Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES)-Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, St. Orsola Hospital IRCCS, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
This study compares two online hemodiafiltration (HDF) dialyzers: polysulfone and cellulose triacetate (ATA). It assesses their effectiveness in removing uremic toxins and reducing inflammation in dialysis patients over 24 months.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Biomaterials Science
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Uremic toxins are key contributors to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk in dialysis patients.
- Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) improves clearance of middle- and large-molecular-weight solutes, potentially reducing cardiovascular mortality.
- Dialyzer membrane properties significantly influence solute removal and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of a polysulfone-based high-flux membrane versus an asymmetric triacetate (ATA) membrane in online HDF.
- To evaluate the impact of these dialyzers on uremic toxin removal and inflammatory status in hemodialysis patients.
- To investigate the in vitro effects of patient serum, treated with different dialyzers, on endothelial cell function.
Main Methods:
- A 24-month, non-randomized, open-label observational study involving 32 hemodialysis patients switched to online HDF.
- Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (polysulfone filter) and Group B (ATA filter), based on hypersensitivity history.
- Monthly assessments included toxin levels, inflammation markers, oxidative stress, immune cell subsets, apoptosis, advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), arterial stiffness (PWV), and mortality.
Main Results:
- The study aims to provide a better understanding of the differential effects of polysulfone and ATA membranes on uremic toxin clearance.
- It will elucidate the impact of blood-membrane interactions on inflammatory status and patient-specific outcomes.
- In vitro analysis will assess serum-induced changes in endothelial cell behavior and gene/protein expression.
Conclusions:
- The findings will offer insights into the comparative performance of established and novel dialyzer membranes in online HDF.
- This research is expected to inform clinical decisions regarding dialyzer selection for optimizing patient care and reducing cardiovascular risk.
- Understanding membrane-specific effects on uremic toxin profiles and inflammation is crucial for advancing hemodialysis therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Dialysis

