Accuracy of Smart Scales on Weight and Body Composition: Observational Study
Justine Frija-Masson1,2,3, Jimmy Mullaert4,5, Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot1,6
1Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire APOLLO (Personalised medicine in chronic cardiovascular, respiratory, renal diseases and organ transplantation), Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Background:
Smart scales are increasingly used at home by patients to monitor their body weight and body composition, but scale accuracy has not often been documented.
Objective:
The goal of the research was to determine the accuracy of 3 commercially available smart scales for weight and body composition compared with dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the gold standard.
Methods:
We designed a cross-sectional study in consecutive patients evaluated for DEXA in a physiology unit in a tertiary hospital in France. There were no exclusion criteria except patient declining to participate. Patients were weighed with one smart scale immediately after DEXA. Three scales were compared (scale 1: Body Partner [Téfal], scale 2: DietPack [Terraillon], and scale 3: Body Cardio [Nokia Withings]). We determined absolute error between the gold standard values obtained from DEXA and the smart scales for body mass, fat mass, and lean mass.
Results:
The sample for analysis included 53, 52, and 48 patients for each of the 3 tested smart scales, respectively. The median absolute error for body weight was 0.3 kg (interquartile range [IQR] -0.1, 0.7), 0 kg (IQR -0.4, 0.3), and 0.25 kg (IQR -0.10, 0.52), respectively. For fat mass, absolute errors were -2.2 kg (IQR -5.8, 1.3), -4.4 kg (IQR -6.6, 0), and -3.7 kg (IQR -8.0, 0.28), respectively. For muscular mass, absolute errors were -2.2 kg (IQR -5.8, 1.3), -4.4 kg (IQR -6.6, 0), and -3.65 kg (IQR -8.03, 0.28), respectively. Factors associated with fat mass measurement error were weight for scales 1 and 2 (P=.03 and P<.001, respectively), BMI for scales 1 and 2 (P=.034 and P<.001, respectively), body fat for scale 1 (P<.001), and muscular and bone mass for scale 2 (P<.001 for both). Factors associated with muscular mass error were weight and BMI for scale 1 (P<.001 and P=.004, respectively), body fat for scales 1 and 2 (P<.001 for both), and muscular and bone mass for scale 2 (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively).
Conclusions:
Smart scales are not accurate for body composition and should not replace DEXA in patient care.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03803098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03803098.
Related Concept Videos
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
01:52Accuracy and Precision
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
01:19Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...