Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Characteristics and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients classified using cluster analysis: the Fushimi
Hisashi Ogawa1, Yoshimori An1, Hidehisa Nishi2
1Department of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, 1-1, Mukaihata-cho, Fukakusa, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto 612-8555, Japan.
Insights
This study identified six distinct comorbidity clusters in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. These clusters stratify risks for mortality and adverse cardiovascular events, offering new prognostic insights for AF management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Data Science
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) patient risk is typically assessed using clinical risk scores or individual risk factors.
- Multimorbidity clusters, where risk factors co-occur, may have significant prognostic implications.
- Understanding these complex comorbidity patterns is crucial for accurate risk stratification in AF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To perform cluster analysis on a cohort of AF patients.
- To identify distinct comorbidity cluster phenotypes within the AF population.
- To assess the prognostic implications and outcomes associated with these identified phenotypes.
Main Methods:
- Utilized hierarchical cluster analysis on data from the Fushimi AF Registry, a community-based prospective survey.
- Analyzed 4304 AF patients using 42 baseline clinical characteristics.
- Identified six statistically driven comorbidity clusters based on patient demographics and clinical profiles.
Main Results:
- Six distinct AF patient clusters were identified, ranging from younger individuals with low comorbidity burden to the very elderly with complex conditions.
- These clusters included: (i) young, low-risk (n=209); (ii) elderly, low-risk (n=1301); (iii) high atherosclerotic risk factors, no disease (n=1411); (iv) atherosclerotic comorbidities (n=440); (v) history of stroke (n=681); (vi) very elderly (n=262).
- Significant stratification of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events was observed across the six clusters (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Cluster analysis successfully identified six clinically relevant phenotypes in AF patients.
- These distinct phenotypes are associated with varying comorbidity profiles.
- The identified phenotypes demonstrate significant associations with the incidence of clinical outcomes, including mortality and major adverse events.
Aims:
The risk of adverse events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients was commonly stratified by risk factors or clinical risk scores. Risk factors often do not occur in isolation and are often found in multimorbidity 'clusters' which may have prognostic implications. We aimed to perform cluster analysis in a cohort of AF patients and to assess the outcomes and prognostic implications of the identified comorbidity cluster phenotypes.
Methods And Results:
The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of the AF patients in Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on 4304 patients (mean age: 73.6 years, female; 40.3%, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.37 ± 1.69), using 42 baseline clinical characteristics. On hierarchical cluster analysis, AF patients could be categorized into six statistically driven comorbidity clusters: (i) younger ages (mean age: 48.3 years) with low prevalence of risk factors and comorbidities (n = 209); (ii) elderly (mean age: 74.0 years) with low prevalence of risk factors and comorbidities (n = 1301); (iii) those with high prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors, but without atherosclerotic disease (n = 1411); (iv) those with atherosclerotic comorbidities (n = 440); (v) those with history of any-cause stroke (n = 681); and (vi) the very elderly (mean age: 83.4 years) (n = 262). Rates of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events can be stratified by these six identified clusters (log-rank test; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions:
We identified six clinically relevant phenotypes of AF patients on cluster analysis. These phenotypes can be associated with various types of comorbidities and associated with the incidence of clinical outcomes.
Clinical Trial Registration Information:
https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm. Unique identifier: UMIN000005834.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Dysrhythmias II: Classification of Tachyarrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

