Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of acoltremon ophthalmic solution 0.003% and cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion for increased tear production in patients with dry eye disease.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "TFOS DEWS III: Digest" Am J Ophthalmol. 2025; 279:451-553.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Brain network analysis in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using high-density diffuse optical tomography.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Transmigrated neutrophils on the ocular surface and in other tissues: A narrative review.

The ocular surface·2026
Same author

Phenotype of Tear Leukocytes in Seasonal Ocular Allergy and Their Potential Impacts on Ocular Surface Inflammation.

Ocular immunology and inflammation·2026
Same author

Additive effects of common and rare genetic variants on inflammatory bowel disease risk in a cohort with immunodeficiency.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Quantitative Optical Microscopy: Measurement of Cellular Biophysical Features with a Standard Optical Microscope
14:09

Quantitative Optical Microscopy: Measurement of Cellular Biophysical Features with a Standard Optical Microscope

Published on: April 7, 2014

15.9K

Optimization of goblet cell density quantification methods.

Mike Yang1, William Ngo2, Sruthi Srinivasan1

  • 1Centre for Ocular Research and Education, University of Waterloo, School of Optometry & Vision Science, 200 University Avenue West, N2L 3G1, ON, Canada.

Experimental Eye Research
|April 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study optimized conjunctival goblet cell density (GCD) estimation. Storage duration and container type did not affect GCD, enabling accurate quantification within seven weeks for dry eye disease research.

Keywords:
Conjunctival impression cytologyDry eye diseaseGoblet cell density

More Related Videos

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures
07:05

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures

Published on: February 15, 2022

2.8K
Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
11:01

Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

Published on: November 17, 2016

48.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Quantitative Optical Microscopy: Measurement of Cellular Biophysical Features with a Standard Optical Microscope
14:09

Quantitative Optical Microscopy: Measurement of Cellular Biophysical Features with a Standard Optical Microscope

Published on: April 7, 2014

15.9K
Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures
07:05

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures

Published on: February 15, 2022

2.8K
Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
11:01

Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

Published on: November 17, 2016

48.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Cell Biology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate quantification of conjunctival goblet cell density (GCD) is crucial for understanding dry eye disease (DED) pathophysiology.
  • Standardized methods for GCD estimation are needed to improve reliability in clinical trials.
  • Optimizing sample storage and quantification techniques can enhance efficiency and accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a standardized, accurate, and efficient method for estimating conjunctival goblet cell density (GCD).
  • To optimize sample storage conditions and quantification methods for GCD analysis.
  • To establish a reliable protocol for GCD measurement in clinical research settings.

Main Methods:

  • Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) membranes were collected from 32 participants.
  • Samples were randomized for storage duration (2-3 weeks vs. 6-7 weeks) and container type (microcentrifuge tube vs. histology cassette).
  • GCD was quantified using three methods: full CIC membrane count, partial membrane count, and manual counting, with time efficiency recorded.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in GCD were found based on storage duration (p=0.745) or container type (p=0.552).
  • Quantification times varied: full method (14.8 min), partial method (4.6 min), and manual method (5.0 min).
  • The full and manual counting methods showed stronger agreement (bias: 0.4, LOA: [-4.6, 5.5]) compared to the full and partial methods (bias: 0.5, LOA: [-18, 17]).

Conclusions:

  • An optimized method for GCD quantification was established, effective within seven weeks of sample collection.
  • The findings support the use of standardized CIC procedures for accurate and efficient GCD assessment.
  • This optimized method can aid clinical trials investigating DED pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies.