Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Evidence-based clinical practice guideline: Reconstruction after skin cancer resection
Andrew Chen1, John G Albertini1, Jeremy S Bordeaux1
1University of Connecticut; The Skin Surgery Center; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University; Kaiser Permanente; Duke University Medical Center; American Society of Plastic Surgeons; Galaria Plastic Surgery and Dermatology; Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Florida Center for Dermatology; Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Private practice; Cooper Medical Center, Rowan University; University of South Florida; University of Central Florida; University of California, Irvine; Piedmont Plastic Surgery and Dermatology; Pennsylvania State University; Rush University Medical Center; University of Illinois at Chicago; R. L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center; University of California, Davis, Medical Center; University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics; Private practice; Northwestern University.
This study developed evidence-based guidelines for skin cancer reconstruction, focusing on common elements to improve patient care. Recommendations cover reconstruction timing, anticoagulation, antibiotics, pain management, and follow-up, highlighting the need for further research.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Plastic Surgery
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Skin cancer resection often requires complex reconstruction.
- Existing reconstructive techniques are diverse, leading to varied clinical approaches.
- A need exists for standardized, evidence-based guidelines for post-skin cancer surgery reconstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish consensus and develop evidence-based recommendations for reconstruction after skin cancer resection.
- To identify common principles applicable across different reconstructive techniques and clinical settings.
- To improve the quality of patient care through standardized management strategies.
Main Methods:
- Convened a multi-disciplinary work group with diverse stakeholder involvement.
- Conducted a systematic literature review to identify relevant scientific research.
- Utilized the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology for appraising evidence quality.
Main Results:
- Developed recommendations on key aspects of reconstruction: timing, anticoagulation, antibiotic use, pain control, and follow-up.
- Distinguished between office-based and facility-based treatment options where applicable.
- Identified areas where evidence was insufficient for high-level recommendations.
Conclusions:
- The guidelines provide a framework for managing reconstruction after skin cancer resection.
- Further methodologically robust studies are crucial to strengthen recommendations and guide clinical practice.
- Standardization of care can enhance patient outcomes in reconstructive surgery.
More Related Videos
09:30Tissue Characterization after a New Disaggregation Method for Skin Micro-Grafts Generation
Published on: March 4, 2016
13:35Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells