Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Lower preoperative hip abductor muscle attenuation on CT is associated with early total hip arthroplasty dislocation: a matched case control study.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2026

Same author

Importance of the delivery route for the tolerability and efficacy of immunomodulatory agents for lung cancer.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

The effect of prior hip arthroscopy on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2026

Same author

Acetabular cup-native femoral head size discrepancy in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis on intraoperative sizing verification.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2026

Same author

Outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility cups across body mass index categories: a multi-centric cohort study.

International orthopaedics·2026

Same author

Assessing laboratory capacity for diagnosis of fungal infections in France: A multicentre survey within the SINFONI network.

Medical mycology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Use of an Optical Trap for Study of Host-Pathogen Interactions for Dynamic Live Cell Imaging

Use of an Optical Trap for Study of Host-Pathogen Interactions for Dynamic Live Cell Imaging

Published on: July 28, 2011

Some undesirable traps which can mislead the pathologist.

Victor Mercier¹, Milène Sasso², Pascal Kouyoumdjian³

¹CNRS, Université Montpellier - IRD, Nîmes, France victor.mercier@gmail.com.

Journal of Clinical Pathology

|May 1, 2021

Summary

Accurate parasite identification is crucial in clinical labs. This article highlights the risks of misdiagnosis due to non-expert analysis and inert elements, emphasizing a systematic approach for reliable parasite detection.

Keywords:

anatomy hospital morphological and microscopic findings parasites pathology department

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Imaging in Human and Mouse Tissues

Author Spotlight: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Imaging in Human and Mouse Tissues

Published on: August 18, 2023

Detection of Extravascular Trypanosoma Parasites by Fine Needle Aspiration

Detection of Extravascular Trypanosoma Parasites by Fine Needle Aspiration

Published on: August 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Use of an Optical Trap for Study of Host-Pathogen Interactions for Dynamic Live Cell Imaging

Use of an Optical Trap for Study of Host-Pathogen Interactions for Dynamic Live Cell Imaging

Published on: July 28, 2011

Author Spotlight: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Imaging in Human and Mouse Tissues

Author Spotlight: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Imaging in Human and Mouse Tissues

Published on: August 18, 2023

Detection of Extravascular Trypanosoma Parasites by Fine Needle Aspiration

Detection of Extravascular Trypanosoma Parasites by Fine Needle Aspiration

Published on: August 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Medical Parasitology
Clinical Microbiology
Diagnostic Pathology

Background:

Macroscopic and microscopic examinations remain essential for parasite disease diagnosis in clinical laboratories.
Despite advancements in molecular biology, these traditional methods require significant expertise and are prone to errors.
Non-expert microbiologists may face challenges in accurate parasite identification.

Observation:

Inert elements in samples can frequently lead to misidentification of parasites.
The diagnostic process is often manual, lacking automation and increasing the potential for human error.
Three specific case examples illustrate the risks associated with parasite misdiagnosis.

Findings:

Parasite misidentification poses a significant risk in clinical diagnostic settings.
Errors can arise from the misinterpretation of non-parasitic material within patient samples.
A systematic diagnostic approach is necessary to mitigate these identification errors.

Implications:

Reliable parasite diagnosis is critical for effective patient treatment and management.
Standardized protocols and enhanced training can improve diagnostic accuracy.
Addressing the challenges in parasite identification can prevent patient harm and optimize healthcare outcomes.