Evaluation of the Criteria to Distinguish Left Bundle Branch Pacing From Left Ventricular Septal Pacing
Shengjie Wu1, Xueying Chen2, Songjie Wang1
1Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; The Key Lab of Cardiovascular Disease, Science and Technology of Wenzhou, Wenzhou, China.
Insights
Confirming left bundle branch (LBB) capture is crucial for effective pacing. This study found that an abrupt decrease in stimulus-to-ventricular activation time (Stim-LVAT) of ≥10 ms and selective LBB pacing (LBBP) are reliable indicators for confirming LBB capture.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Distinguishing left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) from left ventricular septum pacing (LVSP) requires validated criteria.
- Previous methods for confirming left bundle branch (LBB) capture lack comprehensive validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the predictive value of electrocardiogram and intracardiac electrogram characteristics for confirming left bundle branch (LBB) capture.
- To validate criteria for differentiating LBBP from LVSP.
Main Methods:
- Utilized His bundle pacing lead, LBBP lead, and multielectrode catheter for LBB capture confirmation.
- Defined direct LBB capture by retrograde His potential and/or anterograde left conduction system potentials.
- Analyzed parameters including His potential, LBB potential, stimulus-to-peak ventricular activation time (Stim-LVAT), and paced QRS morphology.
Main Results:
- Thirty patients (21 non-LBBB, 9 LBBB) with confirmed LBB capture were analyzed.
- 100% of patients showed paced right bundle branch block during LBB capture.
- Selective LBBP or an abrupt decrease in Stim-LVAT (≥10 ms) reliably indicated LBB capture.
Conclusions:
- Direct LBB capture is confirmed by retrograde His potential and anterograde left conduction system potentials.
- Abrupt decrease in Stim-LVAT (≥10 ms) and selective LBBP serve as simple, effective criteria for confirming LBB capture.
Objectives:
This study sought to assess the predictive value of the proposed electrocardiogram and intracardiac electrogram characteristics for confirmation of left bundle branch (LBB) capture.
Background:
Previously proposed criteria to distinguish left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septum (LVS) pacing (LVSP) have not been fully validated.
Methods:
A His bundle pacing lead, an LBBP lead, and a multielectrode catheter at the LVS were placed. Direct LBB capture was defined as demonstration of retrograde His potential on the His bundle pacing lead and/or anterograde left conduction system potentials on the multielectrode catheter during LBBP. The routinely used parameters-His, LBB potential, time from stimulus to peak ventricular activation (Stim-LVAT), and paced QRS morphology during LVSP and LBBP at various depths and outputs were analyzed.
Results:
Thirty patients (21 non-left bundle branch block [LBBB], 9 LBBB) who demonstrated direct LBB capture using the defined criteria were included. The proportion of paced right bundle branch block was 100% during LBB capture in all patients compared to 23.4% in non-LBBB and 44.4% in LBBB during LVSP. LBB potential was recorded in all patients during intrinsic rhythm (non-LBBB group) or His corrective pacing in LBBB. Paced QRS duration was longer during selective LBBP compared to nonselective LBBP or LVSP only. All patients with characteristics of selective LBBP or abrupt decrease in Stim-LVAT of ≥10 ms demonstrated LBB capture.
Conclusions:
Direct LBB capture can be confirmed by recording retrograde His potential and anterograde left conduction system potentials. Abrupt decrease in Stim-LVAT of ≥10 ms and demonstration of selective LBBP could be used as simple criteria to confirm LBB capture.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation


