Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

3D Printing Model of a Patient's Specific Lumbar Vertebra
Published on: April 14, 2023
Patient-specific statistical shape modeling for optimal spinal sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal fusion
Pascal R Furrer1, Sebastiano Caprara2, Florian Wanivenhaus1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Patients needing revision surgery for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after L4/5 spinal fusion showed greater deviations from optimal spinal alignment compared to asymptomatic controls. Statistical shape modeling identified these alignment differences, potentially aiding future surgical planning to reduce ASD risk.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Biomechanical analysis
- Radiographic assessment
Background:
- Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a complication following spinal fusion.
- Understanding spinal alignment deviations is crucial for preventing ASD.
- Patient-specific statistical shape modeling (SSM) offers a novel approach to analyze spinal alignment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare spinal alignment differences between patients who developed ASD after L4/5 spinal fusion and asymptomatic controls.
- To investigate the utility of patient-specific SSM in identifying alignment discrepancies associated with ASD.
- To assess the potential of SSM in preoperative planning to mitigate ASD risk.
Main Methods:
- A case-control study comparing patients with ASD (n=22) requiring revision surgery and asymptomatic controls (n=25) after L4/5 spinal fusion.
- Preoperative and postoperative lateral radiographs were analyzed using SSM to calculate optimal spinal sagittal alignment.
- The deviation from the optimal alignment was quantified by measuring the 2D distance from the SSM-calculated ideal to the actual patient position.
Main Results:
- Patients with ASD exhibited a greater postoperative mean distance from the SSM-calculated optimal alignment (86.8 mm) compared to controls (67.7 mm), though not statistically significant (p=0.119).
- A significant difference was observed in the postoperative vertical distance of the L4 segment, with the ASD group showing greater deviation (5.69 ± 3.0 mm) than controls (3.58 ± 3.5 mm, p=0.034).
- Greater alignment differences were noted in ASD patients at more cranial levels, suggesting a relationship between deviation and ASD development.
Conclusions:
- Lumbar spinal fusion patients requiring revision for ASD demonstrate significant deviations from optimal spinal sagittal alignment compared to asymptomatic individuals.
- Patient-specific SSM can identify these alignment differences, highlighting its potential role in preoperative planning.
- Further research is warranted to integrate SSM with existing indices for improved ASD risk reduction strategies.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
07:44Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
Published on: March 23, 2019