Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG
Published on: June 14, 2010
Spatial-Temporal Functional Mapping Combined With Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials in Predicting Cortical
Yujing Wang1, Mark A Hays2, Christopher Coogan1
1Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Combining spatial-temporal functional mapping (STFM) with cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) improves the accuracy of functional brain mapping, offering a more precise alternative to electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM) for epilepsy surgery.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neurosurgery
- Epileptology
Background:
- Functional human brain mapping is crucial for epilepsy surgery, often using electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM).
- ESM is time-consuming, painful, and risks overestimating eloquent areas due to stimulation spread.
- Passive spatial-temporal functional mapping (STFM) is a potential alternative but shows less correspondence with ESM for language than motor function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate why spatial-temporal functional mapping (STFM) and electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM) show discrepancies in mapping language areas.
- To test the hypothesis that stimulation effects propagate to connected cortical areas, influencing ESM results.
- To improve the accuracy of functional brain mapping by integrating STFM with measures of effective connectivity.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated five patients undergoing invasive monitoring for epilepsy.
- Language areas were identified using electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM).
- Passive intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) recordings were used during language tasks.
- Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) were measured to assess effective connectivity.
- A logistic regression model combined high gamma power from STFM and CCEPs to predict ESM results.
Main Results:
- The combined STFM and CCEPs model achieved 87.7% accuracy in predicting ESM results.
- STFM alone achieved 71.8% accuracy, indicating a significant improvement with CCEPs.
- This suggests that considering effective connectivity enhances the agreement between STFM and ESM.
Conclusions:
- Incongruities between STFM and ESM for language mapping may stem from stimulation effects spreading to interconnected cortical areas.
- Integrating STFM with CCEPs provides a more accurate functional brain mapping approach.
- Further research with larger patient cohorts is needed to establish the clinical utility of these combined mapping techniques.
More Related Videos
08:45Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
13:32Recording Human Electrocorticographic ECoG Signals for Neuroscientific Research and Real-time Functional Cortical Mapping
Published on: June 26, 2012