Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.5K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.5K
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

175
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
175
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.3K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

409
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
409
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

42.7K
Overview
42.7K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

4.8K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A time dependent kinetic small angle neutron scattering study of a novel YFe phase.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2013
Same author

Determination of hyperfine field distributions in amorphous magnets.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2011
Same author

Chiral paramagnetic skyrmion-like phase in MnSi.

Physical review letters·2009
Same author

Evidence for a spin emulsion.

Physical review letters·2008
Same author

Kinetic neutron diffraction and SANS studies of phase formation in bioactive machinable glass ceramics.

Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)·2008
Same author

Time-frequency and time-scale techniques for the classification of native and bioprosthetic heart valve sounds.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·1998

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Pseudotype Virus System for Assessing Omicron Subvariants and Neutralizing Antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 Research
06:08

Author Spotlight: A Pseudotype Virus System for Assessing Omicron Subvariants and Neutralizing Antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 Research

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.5K

Error rates in SARS-CoV-2 testing examined with Bayes' theorem.

P M Bentley1

  • 1European Spallation Source ESS ERIC, Box 176, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.

Heliyon
|May 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Large-scale SARS-CoV-2 testing requires understanding real-world error rates. Many positive results, especially with mild symptoms, may be false, indicating tests cannot definitively clear individuals.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferenceCorrectionFalse negativeFalse positiveRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2

More Related Videos

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

628
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Pseudotype Virus System for Assessing Omicron Subvariants and Neutralizing Antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 Research
06:08

Author Spotlight: A Pseudotype Virus System for Assessing Omicron Subvariants and Neutralizing Antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 Research

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.5K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

628
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic necessitates widespread SARS-CoV-2 testing for transmission control.
  • Field performance of diagnostic tests, like RT-PCR, may differ from laboratory conditions.
  • Accurate quantification of test error rates is crucial for public health strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 testing under real-world conditions.
  • To develop methods for correcting bulk test results and assess societal testing needs.
  • To determine the limitations of current and future diagnostic tests for clearing infection.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) studies.
  • Construction of a clinical test confusion matrix.
  • Analysis of test sensitivity and specificity requirements for various use cases.
  • Sequential analysis of common testing scenarios.

Main Results:

  • In some regions, a significant proportion of mild symptomatic individuals with positive test results may not be infected.
  • Current and anticipated diagnostic tests are insufficient to definitively clear individuals of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
  • Large-scale testing for infection tracing may not be viable in all regions due to laboratory capacity.

Conclusions:

  • Regional authorities must monitor operational test characteristics before implementing large-scale testing programs.
  • RT-PCR should not be the sole gold standard for scaled SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis; clinical assessment and diverse diagnostic tests are essential.
  • Focused, capacity-aware testing strategies are recommended over broad infection tracing in resource-limited settings.