Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

299
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
299
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.4K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.4K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

62.7K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
62.7K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

253.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
253.3K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.0K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.0K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

220
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
220

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sedentary time and television viewing time are associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality: A systematic review of systematic reviews.

Preventive medicine·2026
Same author

The EU Health Task Force for emergency preparedness and response: overview of its first 2 years of operation, 2023 to 2025.

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin·2026
Same author

Impact of environmental factors and climate conditions on the occurrence of Vibrio and Shewanella infections in Norway, 2014-2018.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Lower-limb physical function is associated with executive function in frail older adults.

GeroScience·2026
Same author

Risk factors associated with long-term shedding infections of non-typhoidal Salmonella in humans.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology·2025
Same author

Moderate intensity intermittent lifestyle physical activity is associated with better executive function in older adults.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2024
Same journal

Identifying the challenges in implementing open science [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].

MNI open research·2021
Same journal

From data sharing to data publishing [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations].

MNI open research·2019
Same journal

Defining Success in Open Science.

MNI open research·2018
Same journal

A lentiviral system for efficient knockdown of proteins in neuronal cultures [version 1; referees: 2 approved].

MNI open research·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform
11:08

Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform

Published on: January 13, 2019

12.6K

Defining Success in Open Science [version 2; peer review:2 approved].

Sarah E Ali-Khan1,2, Antoine Jean1, Emily MacDonald1

  • 1Faculty of Law, Centre for Intellectual Property Policy (CIPP), McGill University, 3644 Rue Peel, Montreal, H3A 1W9, Canada.

MNI Open Research
|May 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Open Science collaboration (OS) offers a promising path to address unsustainable innovation and inequities. Experts convened to define successful OS outcomes for research, innovation, and social impact, aiming to develop evaluation tools.

Keywords:
EvaluationOpen Scienceindicatorsinnovationintellectual propertyopen accesspolicysocial and economic benefits

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.7K
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform
11:08

Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform

Published on: January 13, 2019

12.6K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.7K
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Life Sciences
  • Innovation Systems
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Growing concerns regarding unsustainable innovation systems and inequities in science.
  • Urgent global need to spur innovation and ensure equitable benefit distribution.
  • Open Science collaboration (OS) is recognized as a key strategy to address these challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To gather expert perspectives on the desired outcomes of successful Open Science.
  • To inform policy development for the adoption and implementation of OS.
  • To identify key indicators for assessing the impact of OS in life sciences.

Main Methods:

  • Convening an international Open Science Leadership Forum with diverse stakeholders.
  • Facilitating discussions on successful OS outcomes, policy, and implementation.
  • Summarizing delegate views on OS contributions to research, innovation, and social impact.

Main Results:

  • Delegates shared views on what constitutes successful Open Science in life sciences.
  • Identified key areas for OS to deliver research, innovation, and social impact.
  • Initiated a process to develop a toolkit of indicators for OS assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Open Science collaboration holds significant potential for advancing research, innovation, and social benefit.
  • Developing robust evidence and assessment tools is crucial for widespread OS adoption.
  • The ultimate goal is to empower stakeholders to optimize innovation ecosystems for public and patient value.