Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
Published on: April 13, 2013
Houda Kaddioui1, Luc Duong1, Julie Joncas1
1Department of Software and IT Engineering, Ecole de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 1K3 (H.K., L.D.); Division of Orthopedics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montréal, Canada (J.J., C.B., I.N., O.C., S.P., G.G., H.L.); and Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada (M.L.N., S.P., G.G., H.L.).
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
This study developed an automated computer program to determine bone maturity in teenagers with spinal curvature. By analyzing pelvic X-rays, the model assigns a Risser stage, which helps doctors track growth. The tool performed as well as or better than human experts, offering a consistent way to standardize these assessments.
Area of Science:
Background:
No prior work had resolved the inconsistency inherent in manual skeletal maturity grading for adolescent spinal deformities. That uncertainty drove the need for reliable, automated tools to assist clinical decision-making. Prior research has shown that human assessment of pelvic development often suffers from significant interobserver variability. This gap motivated the development of computational approaches to standardize staging. Current manual methods rely heavily on the subjective interpretation of radiographic features by trained personnel. Such reliance frequently leads to discrepancies in treatment planning for patients with spinal conditions. This study addresses the challenge of creating a consistent, objective framework for staging bone maturity. The integration of deep learning models into orthopedic workflows remains a promising area for improving diagnostic precision.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study is to develop an automatic method for Risser stage assessment using deep learning techniques. This tool is intended for integration into the management panel of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The researchers sought to address the limitations of manual grading, which often lacks consistency across different clinical observers. By automating the process, they hope to provide a more standardized approach to evaluating skeletal maturity. The project was motivated by the need for objective tools in orthopedic practice to assist physicians. The authors focused on utilizing posteroanterior radiographs to train a network capable of accurate classification. They aimed to validate this model by comparing its performance against the variability observed among trained human readers. This work seeks to establish a reliable framework for future clinical decision support systems.
The model achieves an overall accuracy of 78.0% in grading skeletal maturity. This performance is measured against the ground truth, yielding a Fleiss κ coefficient of 0.72, which indicates substantial agreement compared to the 0.65 value observed among human experts.
The researchers utilized a convolutional neural network architecture. This specific deep learning tool was trained on a dataset of 1830 posteroanterior pelvic radiographs to classify images according to the established Risser staging system.
The pelvic region is necessary because it contains the iliac crest, which serves as the anatomical landmark for the Risser staging system. Cropping images to this specific area ensures the network focuses on the relevant skeletal features required for accurate classification.
The study used a retrospective collection of 1830 posteroanterior radiographs. These images were essential for training the network and validating its performance against the manual grades provided by six trained human observers.
Main Methods:
The investigators employed a retrospective design to evaluate the efficacy of deep learning for radiographic staging. Their review approach involved collecting 1830 posteroanterior images from patients aged ten to eighteen years. Each image underwent preprocessing and cropping to isolate the pelvic anatomy for analysis. The team utilized six trained readers to establish a manual ground truth for comparison. They applied the Fleiss κ statistical measure to quantify the agreement between human observers. The researchers then trained a computational model to replicate the Risser classification process automatically. Validation occurred by comparing the machine-generated grades against the established human baseline. This systematic evaluation ensured that the model performance could be benchmarked against existing clinical standards.
Main Results:
The automated grading method achieved an overall accuracy of 78.0% when compared to the established ground truth. This model demonstrated a Fleiss κ coefficient of 0.72, representing substantial agreement with manual assessments. In contrast, the six experienced human graders showed a lower κ coefficient of 0.65. The overall agreement among these human observers was recorded at 74.5%. These findings indicate that the computational tool matches or exceeds the performance of human experts. The data suggests that the network effectively identifies the relevant features for Risser staging. The results highlight the potential for reducing variability in skeletal maturity assessments. This performance level confirms the feasibility of using deep learning for standardized radiographic interpretation.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that their automated model offers a robust alternative for standardizing bone maturity assessments. This approach demonstrates substantial agreement with established ground truth benchmarks. The researchers suggest that the tool provides a reliable mechanism for reducing human-led variability in clinical settings. Their findings indicate that the model achieves performance levels comparable to experienced human readers. The team asserts that this technology could assist physicians in managing adolescent spinal conditions more effectively. They highlight the potential for the software to provide deeper insights into skeletal development patterns. The study concludes that automated grading represents a viable path toward more consistent radiographic interpretation. These results support the implementation of deep learning as a supportive tool in orthopedic practice.
The researchers measured interobserver variability using the Fleiss κ statistical test. This metric allowed them to compare the consistency of the automated model against the performance of six human readers, revealing a 74.5% agreement rate among the human graders.
The authors propose that the model could assist physicians with the task of grading and provide additional insights into bone maturity. They suggest this work offers a new method for standardization in clinical practice.