Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Artificial Intelligence for Classification of Soft-Tissue Masses at US
Benjamin Wang1, Laetitia Perronne1, Christopher Burke1
1Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17th St, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10003 (B.W., C.B., R.S.A.); and Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France (L.P.).
Purpose:
To train convolutional neural network (CNN) models to classify benign and malignant soft-tissue masses at US and to differentiate three commonly observed benign masses.
Materials And Methods:
In this retrospective study, US images obtained between May 2010 and June 2019 from 419 patients (mean age, 52 years ± 18 [standard deviation]; 250 women) with histologic diagnosis confirmed at biopsy or surgical excision (n = 227) or masses that demonstrated imaging characteristics of lipoma, benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor, and vascular malformation (n = 192) were included. Images in patients with a histologic diagnosis (n = 227) were used to train and evaluate a CNN model to distinguish malignant and benign lesions. Twenty percent of cases were withheld as a test dataset, and the remaining cases were used to train the model with a 75%-25% training-validation split and fourfold cross-validation. Performance of the model was compared with retrospective interpretation of the same dataset by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to clinical history. A second group of US images from 275 of the 419 patients containing the three common benign masses was used to train and evaluate a separate model to differentiate between the masses. The models were trained on the Keras machine learning platform (version 2.3.1), with a modified pretrained VGG16 network. Performance metrics of the model and of the radiologists were compared by using the McNemar test, and 95% CIs for performance metrics were estimated by using the Clopper-Pearson method (accuracy, recall, specificity, and precision) and the DeLong method (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve).
Results:
The model trained to classify malignant and benign masses demonstrated an accuracy of 79% (95% CI: 68, 88) on the test data, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.98), matching the performance of two expert readers. Performance of the model distinguishing three benign masses was lower, with an accuracy of 71% (95% CI: 61, 80) on the test data.
Conclusion:
The trained CNN was capable of differentiating between benign and malignant soft-tissue masses depicted on US images, with performance matching that of two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists.© RSNA, 2020.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...

