Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
Automated Analysis of Alignment in Long-Leg Radiographs by Using a Fully Automated Support System Based on Artificial
Justus Schock1, Daniel Truhn1, Daniel B Abrar1
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (J.S., D.B.A., S.N.); Institute of Computer Vision and Imaging, RWTH University Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52072 Aachen, Germany (J.S., D.M.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany (D.T., M.P., F.M., C.K., S.N.); and Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute of Informatics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (S.C.).
Purpose:
To develop and validate a deep learning-based method for automatic quantitative analysis of lower-extremity alignment.
Materials And Methods:
In this retrospective study, bilateral long-leg radiographs (LLRs) from 255 patients that were obtained between January and September of 2018 were included. For training data (n = 109), a U-Net convolutional neural network was trained to segment the femur and tibia versus manual segmentation. For validation data (n = 40), model parameters were optimized. Following identification of anatomic landmarks, anatomic and mechanical axes were identified and used to quantify alignment through the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) and femoral anatomic-mechanical angle (AMA). For testing data (n = 106), algorithm-based angle measurements were compared with reference measurements by two radiologists. Angles and time for 30 random radiographs were compared by using repeated-measures analysis of variance and one-way analysis of variance, whereas correlations were quantified by using Pearson r and intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results:
Bilateral LLRs of 255 patients (mean age, 26 years ± 23 [standard deviation]; range, 0-88 years; 157 male patients) were included. Mean Sørensen-Dice coefficients for segmentation were 0.97 ± 0.09 for the femur and 0.96 ± 0.11 for the tibia. Mean HKAAs and AMAs as measured by the readers and the algorithm ranged from 0.05° to 0.11° (P = .5) and from 4.82° to 5.43° (P < .001). Interreader correlation coefficients ranged from 0.918 to 0.995 (r range, P < .001), and agreement was almost perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.87-0.99). Automatic analysis was faster than the two radiologists' manual measurements (3 vs 36 vs 35 seconds, P < .001).
Conclusion:
Fully automated analysis of LLRs yielded accurate results across a wide range of clinical and pathologic indications and is fast enough to enhance and accelerate clinical workflows.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020See also commentary by Andreisek in this issue.
