Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.5K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

8.8K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
8.8K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.5K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.5K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

8.2K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

7.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
7.9K
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

7.0K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Digital N-of-1 trials and their application in experimental physiology.

Experimental physiology·2026
Same author

Insulin enables acquisition of the IL7R<sup>+</sup> memory phenotype in PD1<sup>+</sup> T cells in RA tissues.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

Bayes factor hypothesis testing in meta-analyses: Practical advantages and methodological considerations.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Untangling Dialysis Received in a Nursing Home from Home Hemodialysis in the Community.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

CD5L insufficiency exacerbates skeletal joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Prompt engineering of large language models for paper screening in medical meta-analyses and systematic reviews: A prospective comparative study - CORRIGENDUM.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

A comparison of preprint search aggregators: comprehensive identification of preprints in the information retrieval stage of evidence syntheses.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Meta-research on key metrics of preregistered scoping reviews.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Facilitators and barriers to engaging patient partners in knowledge syntheses: A stage-based approach.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Response to: Five methodological considerations for validating LLMs in risk of bias assessment.

Research synthesis methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

852

Study specific prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A tutorial: Prediction intervals in

Robbie C M van Aert1, Christopher H Schmid2, David Svensson3

  • 1Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Research Synthesis Methods
|May 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This tutorial introduces empirical Bayes estimates for random-effects meta-analysis, offering better study-specific effect estimates and prediction intervals. Researchers should note potential issues with prediction interval coverage when between-study variance is small.

Keywords:
best linear unbiased predictionempirical Bayes estimateforest plotprediction intervalshrinkage

More Related Videos

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

852
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Meta-analysis methodology

Background:

  • Random-effects meta-analysis often prioritizes pooled effect estimates.
  • Study-specific effect estimates are also crucial for detailed interpretation, commonly visualized in forest plots.
  • Existing methods may not fully capture the nuances of individual study effects within a meta-analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the statistical theory and methodology for estimating study-specific true effects using empirical Bayes estimates (or Best Unbiased Linear Predictions) under the random-effects model.
  • To introduce prediction intervals for quantifying the range of study-specific true effects.
  • To illustrate the application of these methods using published meta-analyses and a simulation study.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized empirical Bayes estimation, also known as Best Unbiased Linear Predictions, within the random-effects meta-analysis framework.
  • Developed and applied prediction intervals to estimate the range of study-specific true effects.
  • Conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of prediction intervals, particularly concerning coverage probability under varying between-study variance conditions.
  • Illustrated the methodology with two real-world meta-analysis examples.

Main Results:

  • Empirical Bayes estimates provide a robust method for estimating study-specific true effects in random-effects meta-analysis.
  • Prediction intervals offer a plausible range for these study-specific effects.
  • Simulation results indicated that prediction intervals may have substantially lower coverage probability than expected when the between-study variance is small but non-zero, a critical caveat for researchers.
  • Demonstrated how these estimates and intervals can enhance forest plots for better visualization.

Conclusions:

  • Empirical Bayes estimates and associated prediction intervals offer valuable insights into study-specific effects in meta-analysis.
  • Researchers must be aware of the potential undercoverage of prediction intervals when the between-study variance is small.
  • The proposed methodology, supported by clear theoretical underpinnings, has the potential to improve the interpretation and adoption of study-specific effect estimation in meta-analysis.