Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic structured pruning and merging for real-time acceleration of reinforcement learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A flexible liquid metal magnetohydrodynamic pump for soft robotic systems.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Vehicle-Embedded Vibrotactile Haptic Feedback for Improved Driving Safety in Power Wheelchairs.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Comparative pan-genomics and in vivo validation identify genetic factors important for virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum and serovar Enteritidis in the avian host.

Microbiological research·2026
Same author

Genome-wide identification of tissue-specific fitness genes in murine models of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infection.

iScience·2026
Same author

Characteristics of a responsible community robot: Data from a Delphi study.

Data in brief·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 6, 2025

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

11.2K

Haptic vs. Visual Neurofeedback for Brain Training: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Farhad Shabani, Sajid Nisar, Hemma Philamore

    IEEE Transactions on Haptics
    |May 4, 2021
    PubMed
    Summary

    Haptic neurofeedback offers a promising alternative to traditional visual or auditory methods, reducing fatigue and improving attention during brain-training tasks, especially when multitasking.

    More Related Videos

    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
    05:12

    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

    Published on: September 18, 2017

    547.7K
    Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
    05:43

    Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

    Published on: May 23, 2019

    5.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Nov 6, 2025

    A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
    07:05

    A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

    Published on: August 24, 2017

    11.2K
    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
    05:12

    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

    Published on: September 18, 2017

    547.7K
    Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
    05:43

    Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

    Published on: May 23, 2019

    5.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Rehabilitation Engineering

    Background:

    • Traditional neurofeedback via visual/auditory channels can cause fatigue and limit mobility.
    • There is a need for more engaging and less restrictive neurofeedback methods.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate haptics as an alternative neurofeedback modality.
    • To evaluate the effectiveness of vibrotactile neurofeedback using a wearable device.

    Main Methods:

    • Two user studies were conducted with a novel wearable haptic device delivering vibrotactile feedback to the neck.
    • Participants experienced three neurofeedback modes: visual-only, haptics-only, and combined.
    • Performance was assessed using a brain-training task measuring attention level and task completion time, with a secondary task in Study II.

    Main Results:

    • Haptics-only and visual-only neurofeedback yielded similar performance in the primary brain-training task.
    • When performing a secondary task, haptic neurofeedback significantly improved attention levels and reduced task completion time compared to visual feedback.
    • Haptic feedback demonstrated an 11% improvement in attention and a 17% improvement in task completion time during dual-tasking.

    Conclusions:

    • Haptic neurofeedback is effective and offers advantages over visual methods, particularly in dual-task scenarios.
    • This approach may enhance user adherence to prolonged neurofeedback therapy by allowing concurrent activity.
    • Future research will focus on validating these findings in patients with ADHD.