Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
An Improved Similarity-Based Clustering Algorithm for Multi-Database Mining
Salim Miloudi1, Yulin Wang1, Wenjia Ding1
1School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
Abstract:
Clustering algorithms for multi-database mining (MDM) rely on computing (n2-n)/2 pairwise similarities between n multiple databases to generate and evaluate m∈[1,(n2-n)/2] candidate clusterings in order to select the ideal partitioning that optimizes a predefined goodness measure. However, when these pairwise similarities are distributed around the mean value, the clustering algorithm becomes indecisive when choosing what database pairs are considered eligible to be grouped together. Consequently, a trivial result is produced by putting all the n databases in one cluster or by returning n singleton clusters. To tackle the latter problem, we propose a learning algorithm to reduce the fuzziness of the similarity matrix by minimizing a weighted binary entropy loss function via gradient descent and back-propagation. As a result, the learned model will improve the certainty of the clustering algorithm by correctly identifying the optimal database clusters. Additionally, in contrast to gradient-based clustering algorithms, which are sensitive to the choice of the learning rate and require more iterations to converge, we propose a learning-rate-free algorithm to assess the candidate clusterings generated on the fly in fewer upper-bounded iterations. To achieve our goal, we use coordinate descent (CD) and back-propagation to search for the optimal clustering of the n multiple database in a way that minimizes a convex clustering quality measure L(θ) in less than (n2-n)/2 iterations. By using a max-heap data structure within our CD algorithm, we optimally choose the largest weight variable θp,q(i) at each iteration i such that taking the partial derivative of L(θ) with respect to θp,q(i) allows us to attain the next steepest descent minimizing L(θ) without using a learning rate. Through a series of experiments on multiple database samples, we show that our algorithm outperforms the existing clustering algorithms for MDM.
More Related Videos
07:41Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
09:20Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
Published on: February 23, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Multi-species Conserved Sequences
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved...