Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
Sharing Reflections on Multisource Feedback in a Peer Group Setting: Stimulating Physicians' Professional Performance
Elisa Bindels1, Myra van den Goor2, Albert Scherpbier3
1E. Bindels was a PhD candidate, Amsterdam Center for Professional Performance and Compassionate Care, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, at the time of the study. The author is now a lecturer, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-4950 .
Purpose:
Reflecting on and using feedback are important for physicians' continuous professional development (CPD). A common format is the discussion of multisource feedback (MSF) in a one-on-one session with a trusted peer or coach. A new approach is to discuss MSF during a peer group session moderated by a professional facilitator. This qualitative study explored how physicians experience participation in these peer group sessions in the context of their CPD.
Method:
Between March and July 2018, 26 physicians were interviewed about their experiences in a peer group session. These physicians represented 13 monospecialty physician groups from 5 general hospitals in the Netherlands. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed iteratively, following the interpretative phenomenological approach.
Results:
Participation was experienced as a process of disclosing and sharing personal reflections with peers while striking a balance between interpersonal proximity to and distance from peers. Sharing reflections with peers rendered the feedback more meaningful, deepened collegial relationships, and created a sense of urgency for improvement. Improvement goals were mostly related to relational fine-tuning in collaboration; goals related to individual career management remained in the background. Influential factors for the perceived effectiveness of the group sessions were related to the facilitator's expertise, group size, continuity and quality of collegial relationships, personal vulnerabilities, and the context of CPD policy.
Conclusions:
Peer group sessions offered interactivity and established a clear link between individual physicians and their work environments. Sharing reflections on MSF in a peer group setting provided physicians with nuanced insight into their professional performance and fostered a community spirit that supported the implementation of intended changes. Future research should focus on the role of group dynamics and communication strategies and the application of coaching principles, such as drawing up a detailed plan of action and monitoring the follow-up process.
Related Concept Videos
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Social Facilitation
Patient-centered Care

