Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
Sharing Reflections on Multisource Feedback in a Peer Group Setting: Stimulating Physicians' Professional Performance
Elisa Bindels1, Myra van den Goor2, Albert Scherpbier3
1E. Bindels was a PhD candidate, Amsterdam Center for Professional Performance and Compassionate Care, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, at the time of the study. The author is now a lecturer, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-4950 .
Physicians found peer group sessions valuable for continuous professional development (CPD) by sharing multisource feedback (MSF). These sessions enhanced feedback meaning, collegial relationships, and improvement urgency, fostering a supportive community spirit.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Professional Development
- Qualitative Research
Background:
- Continuous professional development (CPD) for physicians relies on feedback reflection.
- Multisource feedback (MSF) is commonly discussed in one-on-one sessions.
- Peer group sessions with a facilitator offer a novel approach to MSF discussion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore physicians' experiences participating in peer group sessions for CPD.
- To understand the qualitative aspects of discussing multisource feedback in a group setting.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study involving interviews with 26 physicians.
- Interviews conducted between March and July 2018 in 5 Dutch general hospitals.
- Interpretative phenomenological approach used for data analysis.
Main Results:
- Physicians experienced a process of sharing personal reflections, balancing closeness and distance with peers.
- Sharing feedback deepened relationships, increased meaningfulness, and fostered a sense of urgency for improvement.
- Improvement goals focused on relational aspects, with career management goals secondary. Facilitator expertise, group dynamics, and relationships influenced effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- Peer group sessions enhance interactivity and connect physicians to their work environments.
- Discussing MSF in peer groups provides nuanced insights and promotes a community spirit for change.
- Future research should explore group dynamics, communication, and coaching principles in these settings.
Related Concept Videos
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Social Facilitation
Patient-centered Care

