Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Pierre-François Loos1, Massimiliano Comin2, Xavier Blase2
1Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, F-31400 Toulouse, France.
Abstract:
With the aim of completing our previous efforts devoted to local and Rydberg transitions in organic compounds, we provide a series of highly accurate vertical transition energies for intramolecular charge-transfer transitions occurring in (π-conjugated) molecular compounds. To this end, we apply a composite protocol consisting of linear-response CCSDT excitation energies determined with Dunning's double-ζ basis set corrected by CC3/CCSDT-3 energies obtained with the corresponding triple-ζ basis. Further basis set corrections (up to aug-cc-pVQZ) are obtained at the CCSD and CC2 levels. We report 30 transitions obtained in 17 compounds (aminobenzonitrile, aniline, azulene, benzonitrile, benzothiadiazole, dimethylaminobenzonitrile, dimethylaniline, dipeptide, β-dipeptide, hydrogen chloride, nitroaniline, nitrobenzene, nitrodimethylaniline, nitropyridine N-oxide, N-phenylpyrrole, phthalazine, and quinoxaline]. These reference values are then used to benchmark a series of wave functions [CIS(D), SOPPA, RPA(D), EOM-MP2, CC2, CCSD, CCSD(T)(a)*, CCSDR(3), CCSDT-3, CC3, ADC(2), ADC(3), and ADC(2.5)], the Green's function-based Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism performed on top of the partially self-consistent evGW scheme considering two different starting points (BSE/evGW@HF and BSE/evGW@PBE0), and time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT) combined with several exchange-correlation functionals (B3LYP, PBE0, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, LC-ωHPBE, ωB97X, ωB97X-D, and M11). It turns out that the CC methods including triples, namely, CCSD(T)(a)*, CCSDR(3), CCSDT-3, and CC3, provide rather small average deviations (≤0.10 eV), with CC3 emerging as the only chemically accurate approach. ADC(2.5) also performs nicely with a mean absolute error of 0.11 eV for a O(N6) formal scaling, whereas CC2 and BSE/evGW@PBE0 also deliver very satisfying results given their respective O(N5) and O(N4) computational scalings. In the TD-DFT context, the best performing functional is ωB97X-D, closely followed by CAM-B3LYP and M06-2X, all providing mean absolute errors around 0.15 eV relative to the theoretical best estimates.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
10:40High Resolution Phonon-assisted Quasi-resonance Fluorescence Spectroscopy
Published on: June 28, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Molecular Spectroscopy: Absorption and Emission
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Molecular Electronic Transitions
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
Energy Associated With a Charge Distribution
Photochemical Electrocyclic Reactions: Stereochemistry
Selection Rules: Photochemical Activation