Race and ethnicity do not impact eligibility for remdesivir: A single-center experience

Lauren Pischel1,2,3, Makeda Walelo4, Jemma Benson5

  • 1Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Plos One
|May 6, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Racial and ethnic minorities were equally eligible for remdesivir clinical trials compared to non-Hispanic Whites. This study found no significant disparities in remdesivir eligibility based on race or ethnicity alone.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Health Equity
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Clinical trials are crucial for evaluating COVID-19 therapies.
  • Representative enrollment across racial and ethnic groups is essential for equitable treatment access.
  • Potential barriers, including trial eligibility criteria, may affect minority participation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if clinical trial eligibility criteria for remdesivir disproportionately exclude racial and ethnic minorities.
  • To compare remdesivir eligibility rates between minority groups and non-Hispanic Whites.

Main Methods:

  • Observational cohort study at a single healthcare system.
  • Manual review of 201 electronic medical record charts.
  • Analysis of inclusion and exclusion criteria for remdesivir treatment.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in meeting inclusion criteria for remdesivir were observed among Black (72%), Latinx (80%), and White (73%) participants.
  • Similarly, exclusion criteria were met at comparable rates across racial and ethnic groups (Black 43%, Latinx 38%, White 49%).
  • Age differed, with White participants being older on average.

Conclusions:

  • Race or ethnicity alone did not appear to be a barrier to remdesivir eligibility in this healthcare system.
  • Further research is needed to explore other potential barriers to clinical trial participation for minority populations.

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
902
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment01:08

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment

Hepatic impairment, characterized by decreased liver function, does not uniformly mandate adjustments in drug dosage. Whether dosage modifications are necessary depends on various factors related to the drug's metabolism and elimination pathways. If a drug is primarily excreted via the kidneys and bypasses significant hepatic processing, if it undergoes minimal metabolic transformation in the liver, or if it is volatile and primarily expelled through the lungs, dose adjustments may not be...
57
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections01:21

Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections

Calculating drug dosage and accumulation in multiple-dose regimens is crucial for achieving therapeutic efficacy while avoiding toxicity. This involves determining the plasma drug concentrations over time to optimize dosing schedules. The principle of superposition is fundamental in this process, allowing for the prediction of drug concentration in plasma following multiple doses based on single-dose data.The principle of superposition asserts that the plasma concentration-time curves from...
73
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
55
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions01:24

Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions

Intermittent intravenous (IV) infusion is a method of drug administration where medications are delivered over short infusion periods followed by intervals of no drug delivery. This approach helps to prevent sustained high drug concentrations in the bloodstream, reducing the risk of adverse effects associated with prolonged exposure. Unlike continuous infusion, steady-state concentrations may not be achieved during a single dosing cycle but can be reached through repeated...
65