Instructor-led distance learning for training students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized controlled...

Area of Science:

• Medical Education
• Emergency Medicine
• Public Health

Background:

• Conventional learning (CL) for Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training faces limitations including cost, time, and space constraints.
• Effective CPR training is crucial for improving patient survival and neurological outcomes.
• Alternative training methods are needed to overcome the barriers associated with traditional in-person instruction.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate the efficacy of instructor-led distance learning (DL) for CPR training among laypersons.
• To compare CPR skills acquired through DL with those acquired through conventional, face-to-face CL.
• To determine if DL is a suitable alternative to CL for CPR education.

Main Methods:

• A randomized controlled study involving 62 high school students in Korea.
• Participants were assigned to either instructor-led distance learning (DL) via videoconferencing or conventional classroom-based learning (CL).
• CPR skills were assessed and compared between the two groups post-training.

Main Results:

• The DL group demonstrated CPR skill levels comparable to the CL group across most measured variables.
• A statistically significant improvement in mean chest compression depth was observed in the DL group post-training (p<0.001).
• No significant differences were noted in other CPR skill variables between the DL and CL groups.

Conclusions:

• Instructor-led distance learning (DL) is a suitable and effective alternative to conventional learning (CL) for CPR training.
• DL provides a flexible and accessible method for layperson CPR education, particularly relevant in situations limiting face-to-face interaction, such as pandemics.
• This approach can help broaden access to vital CPR skills training.