Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Yulanka S Castro-Dominguez1, Yongfei Wang1, Karl E Minges1
1Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Insights
A new model predicts in-hospital mortality risk after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This tool uses updated variables to identify high-risk patients, aiding quality improvement efforts in cardiovascular care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Standardizing risk assessment is crucial for benchmarking and quality improvement in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
- The CathPCI Registry was updated in 2018 to incorporate additional variables for better classification of high-risk patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a predictive model for in-hospital mortality risk following PCI, utilizing newly available variables.
Main Methods:
- A predictive model was developed and validated using data from 706,263 PCIs.
- A logistic regression model with stepwise selection was applied to a development cohort (70%) and validated on a separate cohort (30%).
- Variables selected in at least 70% of bootstrapped samples or deemed clinically relevant were included.
Main Results:
- In-hospital mortality following PCI was significantly influenced by clinical presentation, procedural urgency, cardiovascular instability, and consciousness level post-cardiac arrest.
- The developed model demonstrated excellent discrimination (C-index: 0.943) and good calibration in the validation cohort.
- The median hospital risk-standardized mortality rate was 1.9%, with an interquartile range of 1.7% to 2.1%.
Conclusions:
- The risk of mortality after PCI can be accurately predicted using a model that incorporates clinical acuity variables not previously captured.
- This validated model serves as a valuable tool for risk stratification and enhancing quality improvement initiatives in PCI procedures.
Background:
Standardization of risk is critical in benchmarking and quality improvement efforts for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). In 2018, the CathPCI Registry was updated to include additional variables to better classify higher-risk patients.
Objectives:
This study sought to develop a model for predicting in-hospital mortality risk following PCI incorporating these additional variables.
Methods:
Data from 706,263 PCIs performed between July 2018 and June 2019 at 1,608 sites were used to develop and validate a new full and pre-catheterization model to predict in-hospital mortality, and a simplified bedside risk score. The sample was randomly split into a development cohort (70%, n = 495,005) and a validation cohort (30%, n = 211,258). The authors created 1,000 bootstrapped samples of the development cohort and used stepwise selection logistic regression on each sample. The final model included variables that were selected in at least 70% of the bootstrapped samples and those identified a priori due to clinical relevance.
Results:
In-hospital mortality following PCI varied based on clinical presentation. Procedural urgency, cardiovascular instability, and level of consciousness after cardiac arrest were most predictive of in-hospital mortality. The full model performed well, with excellent discrimination (C-index: 0.943) in the validation cohort and good calibration across different clinical and procedural risk cohorts. The median hospital risk-standardized mortality rate was 1.9% and ranged from 1.1% to 3.3% (interquartile range: 1.7% to 2.1%).
Conclusions:
The risk of mortality following PCI can be predicted in contemporary practice by incorporating variables that reflect clinical acuity. This model, which includes data previously not captured, is a valid instrument for risk stratification and for quality improvement efforts.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction