Characteristics of central nervous system progression in non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib or
Hiroaki Sakamoto1,2, Noriko Yanagitani1, Ryo Manabe1
1Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
Most patients treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop resistance, leading to metastasis, with progression to the central nervous system (CNS) being a primary concern. Although alectinib has better CNS penetration than crizotinib, patients treated with alectinib also develop CNS progression. CNS metastases more likely occurs during crizotinib treatment due to less blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration capability than alectinib. CNS progression pattern may be different during crizotinib and alecitinib treatment. Understanding the characteristics of CNS progression is important for developing treatment strategies.
Aims:
We compared the clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS metastases among patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatment for ALK-positive NSCLCs.
Methods And Results:
We retrospectively analyzed the radiographic and clinical characteristics of CNS progression in ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib or alectinib at our hospital between July 2011 and May 2020. CNS and systemic tumor progression were evaluated using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Fifty-three and 65 patients were treated with crizotinib and alectinib, respectively. Baseline CNS metastasis was observed in 18 and 27 patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups, respectively. Among the patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups who developed disease progression, 15/49 (30.6%) and 9/44 (20.5%) had CNS progression, respectively (P = .344). Intra-CNS progression-free survival was significantly longer in the alectinib group than in the crizotinib group (median: 14.0 vs 5.6 months, P = .042). The number of CNS metastases sized ≥3 cm, rate of peritumoral brain edema, and the second progression pattern after treatment continuation was not significantly different between the groups.
Conclusion:
We observed no significant difference in the clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS progression between patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatments. Local therapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery, for CNS progression may be suitable and important following alectinib and crizotinib treatment.
Insights
Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with alectinib showed longer intra-CNS progression-free survival than those on crizotinib. However, clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS progression were similar between the two treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Neurology
Background:
- Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Resistance to ALK-TKIs often leads to metastasis, particularly to the central nervous system (CNS).
- While alectinib has better CNS penetration than crizotinib, CNS progression still occurs in patients treated with both agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS metastases in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with crizotinib versus alectinib.
- To understand potential differences in CNS progression patterns between these two ALK-TKI treatments.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical data from ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib or alectinib.
- Evaluation of CNS and systemic tumor progression using CT or MRI scans.
- Comparison of progression rates, intra-CNS progression-free survival, and characteristics of CNS metastases between the two treatment groups.
Main Results:
- Intra-CNS progression-free survival was significantly longer for alectinib (median 14.0 months) compared to crizotinib (median 5.6 months) (P=.042).
- No significant differences were observed in the number of CNS metastases ≥3 cm, rate of peritumoral brain edema, or subsequent progression patterns.
- Rates of CNS progression among patients with disease progression were 30.6% for crizotinib and 20.5% for alectinib (P=.344).
Conclusions:
- Clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS progression did not significantly differ between crizotinib and alectinib treatments.
- Local therapies, such as stereotactic radiosurgery, may be important for managing CNS progression in patients treated with either alectinib or crizotinib.
More Related Videos
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
