Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionation for metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions from paediatric solid tumours
Sophie C Huijskens1, Filipa Guerreiro1, Mirjam Bosman1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Insights
Hypofractionated radiation therapy is feasible for pediatric bone metastases, offering similar or reduced doses to organs at risk (OARs). Personalized treatment plans are crucial, considering the proximity of planning target volumes (PTVs) to OARs.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Metastatic bone and bone marrow lesions in children present a significant treatment challenge.
- Conventional radiation schedules may lead to substantial doses to surrounding healthy tissues.
- Investigating hypofractionated schedules is crucial for improving pediatric cancer treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility of hypofractionated radiation schedules for pediatric bone metastases.
- To compare dosimetric differences between hypofractionated and conventional schedules in surrounding healthy tissues.
- To evaluate the efficacy of different fractionation schedules in pediatric patients with solid tumors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 27 pediatric patients with 50 metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions.
- Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans were created for conventional and hypofractionated schedules.
- Dose distributions to organs at risk (OARs) were compared using equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2).
Main Results:
- Hypofractionated schedules achieved planning target volume (PTV) coverage comparable to conventional schedules for most lesions.
- Hypofractionation resulted in reduced mean doses to most OARs, particularly with 5 and 3 fraction schedules.
- Increased OAR dose was observed when the PTV overlapped with an OAR, especially with hypofractionation.
Conclusions:
- Hypofractionated radiation therapy is a feasible option for pediatric bone metastases, often sparing OARs.
- Personalized treatment planning is essential, considering the spatial relationship between PTV and OARs.
- The optimal fractionation schedule should be tailored to individual patient anatomy and tumor characteristics.
Background And Purpose:
The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of hypofractionated schedules for metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions in children and to investigate dosimetric differences to the healthy surrounding tissues compared to conventional schedules.
Methods:
27 paediatric patients (mean age, 7 years) with 50 metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions (n = 26 cranial, n = 24 extra-cranial) from solid primary tumours (neuroblastoma and sarcoma) were included. The PTV was a 2 mm expansion of the GTV. A prescription dose of 36 and 54 Gy EQD2α/β=10 was used for neuroblastoma and sarcoma lesions, respectively. VMAT plans were optimized for each single lesion using different fractionation schedules: conventional (30/20 fractions, V95% ≥ 99%, D0.1cm3 ≤ 107%) and hypofractionated (15/10/5/3 fractions, V100% ≥ 95%, D0.1cm3 ≤ 120%). Relative EQD2 differences in OARs Dmean between the different schedules were compared.
Results:
PTV coverage was met for all plans independently of the fractionation schedule and for all lesions (V95% range 95.5-100%, V100% range 95.1-100%), with exception of the vertebrae (V100% range 63.5-91.0%). For most OARs, relative mean reduction in the Dmean was seen for the hypofractionated plans compared to the conventional plans, with largest sparing in the 5 fractions (< 43%) followed by the 3 fractions schedule (< 40%). In case of PTV overlap with an OAR, a significant increase in dose for the OAR was observed with hypofractionation.
Conclusions:
For the majority of the cases, iso-effective plans with hypofractionation were feasible with similar or less dose in the OARs. The most suitable fractionation schedule should be personalised depending on the spatial relationship between the PTV and OARs and the prescription dose.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020