Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025
An Efficient and Simple Method to Establish NK and T Cell Lines from Patients with Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus Infection
Published on: March 30, 2018
Circulating Epstein-Barr virus DNA level post induction chemotherapy contributes to prognostication in advanced-stage
Fo-Ping Chen1, Ying-Shan Luo2, Kai Chen1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Eastern Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Background:
To investigate the value of post-induction chemotherapy (IC) cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA (cfEBV DNApostIC) for prognostication in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).
Methods:
A total of 910 histologically proven LA-NPC undergoing radical IC + concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) or targeted radiotherapy (CTRT) or both (CTCRT) were involved. The concentration of cfEBV DNA was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction pre-IC (cfEBV DNApreIC) and at IC completion. CfEBV DNApostIC was classified as undetectable (0 copy/ml) and detectable (>0 copy/ml). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) with respect to the overall survival (OS) was applied to construct a risk stratification system incorporating cfEBV DNApostIC and critical risk factors.
Results:
We observed that 660 (72.5%) and 250 (27.5%) patients had cfEBV DNApostIC undetectable and detectable respectively. CfEBV DNApostIC positive was associated with a significant inferior 5-year OS (76.2% versus 85.9%), metastasis-free survival (DMFS, 71.7% versus 86.4%) and disease-free survival (DFS, 57.7% versus 80.1%) than cfEBV DNApostIC negative (P < 0.001 for all). Additionally, cfEBV DNApostIC was independently significant for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.40-2.59), DMFS (1.99, 1.45-2.71) and DFS (2.38, 1.86-3.06) in multivariate analyses (P < 0.001 for all). RPA modelling yielded three distinct risk groups: low-risk (N0-1 and undetectable cfEBV DNApostIC or N2-3 and pre-treatment cfEBV DNA [cfEBV DNApreIC] <7000), median-risk (N0-1 and detectable cfEBV DNApostIC or N2-3 and cfEBV DNApreIC ≥7000 with undetectable cfEBV DNApostIC) and high-risk (N2-3 and cfEBV DNApreIC ≥7000 with detectable cfEBV DNApostIC), with 5-year OS of 88.1%, 79.2% and 66.9%, respectively. Our risk stratification outperformed TNM classification for predicting death (AUC, 0.631 versus 0.562; P = 0.012) and distant metastasis (0.659 versus 0.562; P = 0.004).
Conclusions:
CfEBV DNApostIC represents an effective indicator of prognostication in LA-NPC. We developed a risk classification system that provides improved OS prediction over the current staging system by combining cfEBV DNApostIC, cfEBV DNApreIC and N-stage classification in LA-NPC.
