Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

04:52
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
1.1K
The evolution, devolution and distribution of UK Biometric Imaginaries
1Department of Sociology, Durham University, 32 Old Elvet, Durham, DH1 3HN UK.
Biosocieties
|May 10, 2021
Summary
UK biometric policymaking involves oversight actors embedded within government visions. These actors challenge biometric imaginaries, revealing policy as a patchwork rather than a singular national strategy, especially with Scotland
Area of Science:
- Public Policy
- Science and Technology Studies
- Law and Governance
Background:
- The UK Home Office's 2018 Biometric Strategy outlines key oversight bodies for biometric data in law enforcement.
- Biometric policymaking is influenced by 'biometric imaginaries' promoted by national and devolved administrations.
- Existing studies often assume national governments project cohesive visions, overlooking complexities in policy implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine UK biometric policymaking by analyzing the roles and influence of oversight actors.
- To challenge the assumption of cohesive national sociotechnical imaginaries in biometric policy.
- To explore how embedded actors contest and shape biometric imaginaries through their actions and perspectives.
Main Methods:
- Mapping of oversight bodies involved in UK biometric data governance.
- Comparative analysis of UK Home Office and Scottish administration biometric strategies.
- Qualitative examination of how embedded actors (commissioners, regulators, advisors) engage with and challenge biometric imaginaries.
Main Results:
- Oversight actors are embedded within, and actively shape, biometric imaginaries.
- UK biometric policy is characterized by a 'patchwork' of influences, not a single dominant vision.
- Embedded actors utilize interpretive flexibility and standpoint to challenge government imaginaries, acting as critical conduits.
- Scotland exhibits a diverging approach to biometric governance, challenging national cohesion assumptions.
Conclusions:
- Biometric policymaking is more fragmented than assumed, with embedded actors playing a crucial role in critiquing and reshaping policy visions.
- The concept of the 'biometric imaginary' needs further characterization to account for diverse interpretations and challenges.
- Understanding the interplay between national imaginaries and localized critiques is essential for effective biometric governance.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
45.5K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
45.5K
Genetic Drift
41.8K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
41.8K
Gene Flow
36.5K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
36.5K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
6.5K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.5K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
60.6K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
60.6K
Limits to Natural Selection
33.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.2K

