Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025
09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
71.7K
Evaluating Measures of Intimate Partner Violence Using Consensus-Based Standards of Validity
Erin F Alexander1, Bethany L Backes2, Matthew D Johnson1
1Department of Psychology, 14787Binghamton University (SUNY), NY, USA.
Trauma, Violence & Abuse
|May 10, 2021
Summary
This review systematically assesses intimate partner violence (IPV) measurement tools, identifying those with psychometric evidence for reliable risk assessment and intervention. It highlights gaps in differentiating violence types, crucial for effective victim protection.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Public Health
- Criminology
Background:
- Routine assessment of intimate partner violence (IPV) by various practitioners is critical for risk judgment, victim protection, and intervention.
- The validity of assessment instruments directly impacts the effectiveness of these crucial actions.
- A comprehensive compilation of existing IPV assessment measures is currently lacking.
Approach:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PubMed, and MEDLINE.
- Included studies focused on the reliability and validity of specific IPV measures, irrespective of format or discipline.
- 222 studies evaluating 87 unique measures met the inclusion criteria for psychometric properties.
Key Points:
- The review details the reliability and validity of 87 distinct IPV assessment measures.
- Measures were rated using Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments-revised criteria and other validity benchmarks.
- A list of recommended measures was generated, alongside a discussion of instruments differentiating IPV types.
Conclusions:
- Existing IPV assessment tools possess varying strengths and weaknesses.
- Further research is needed to enhance the development and application of IPV assessment measures.
- There is a specific need for measures capable of distinguishing between situational couple violence and intimate terrorism.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Reliability and Validity
13.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.3K
01:03Data Validation
6.0K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.0K
01:15Data Validation
365
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
365
01:11Variability: Analysis
249
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
249
01:29Measures of Intelligence
8.0K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.0K
01:20Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
668
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
668