Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025
Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Prevalence and Outcomes of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasty
Michael E Neufeld1, Brent A Lanting1,2, Michael Shehata1
1Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
The prevalence and outcomes of unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) of specimens taken during presumed aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC and infection-free implant survival in this patient population. Secondary aims included identifying factors associated with subsequent infection-related failure in patients with UPC.
Methods:
We reviewed all THA revisions (n = 2,288) performed at our institution from 2006 to 2019. Presumed aseptic revision THAs with intraoperative culture(s) were eligible (n = 1,196), and those with UPC were included in a Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine the infection-free implant survival and in Cox regression analysis to identify factors associated with infection-related failure.
Results:
UPC(s) were documented for 9.2% (110) of 1,196 aseptic THA revisions. The 2- and 5-year infection-free implant survival in the entire UPC cohort was 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 90.5% to 95.7%) and 86.8% (95% CI = 82.9% to 90.7%), respectively. The 2- and 5-year infection-free survival with failure due to infection with the same microorganism as identified in the UPC as the end point was 95.8% (95% CI = 93.7% to 97.9%) and 94.3% (95% CI = 91.7% to 96.9%), respectively. Subsequent infection-related failures caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC were more likely to occur after revisions with ≥2 UPCs than after those with 1 UPC (p = 0.024). Revision due to adverse metal reaction was a risk factor for subsequent infection-related failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.49, 95% CI = 2.69 to 78.04). Patients with a single UPC who were not treated with antibiotics had no subsequent periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC.
Conclusions:
The prevalence of UPC was 9.2%, and the infection-free implant survival in patients with UPC is encouraging. Implant survival free of PJI caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC was excellent. Aseptic revision for adverse metal reaction was a risk factor for subsequent PJI in patients with UPC. No patient with a single UPC who was not treated with antibiotics developed PJI caused by the UPC-identified microorganism, suggesting that in the absence of other signs of infection a single UPC does not warrant antibiotic treatment.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Insights
Unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) occur in 9.2% of aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Infection-free survival is encouraging, and a single UPC without antibiotics did not lead to subsequent infection.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Disease
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) during presumed aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) lack clear prevalence and outcome data.
- Understanding UPCs is crucial for managing potential periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of UPCs in revision THA.
- To evaluate infection-free implant survival in patients with UPCs.
- To identify factors associated with subsequent infection-related failure after UPCs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 2,288 THA revisions from 2006-2019.
- Analysis of 1,196 presumed aseptic revision THAs with intraoperative cultures.
- Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses for survival and risk factors.
Main Results:
- UPCs occurred in 9.2% of eligible cases.
- 2- and 5-year infection-free survival was 93.1% and 86.8% respectively.
- Revision for adverse metal reaction was a significant risk factor for subsequent PJI (HR=14.49).
- No PJI occurred in patients with a single UPC not treated with antibiotics.
Conclusions:
- UPC prevalence is 9.2% with encouraging infection-free survival.
- Implant survival free of PJI caused by the UPC microorganism was excellent.
- Aseptic revision for adverse metal reaction increases PJI risk in UPC patients.
- Single UPCs without antibiotics may not require treatment if other infection signs are absent.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Healthcare Associated Infections I: Iatrogenic, Exogenic and Endogenic
HAIs significantly increase the cost of health care. Extended stays in healthcare institutions, increased disability, increased costs of medications, including specialized antibiotics, and prolonged recovery times add to the patient's expenses and the healthcare institution and funding bodies.
01:26Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
01:22Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
01:26Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
01:28Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management