Training the Trainers in Ultrasound-guided Access to Improve Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement among Children

Vikas N O'Reilly-Shah1, Amber Franz1, Cornelius B Groenewald1

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash.

Insights

Training pediatric anesthesiologists in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement reduced the number of attempts needed. However, the time to establish PIV access remained unchanged.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Anesthesiology
  • Medical Education
  • Ultrasound Technology

Background:

  • Difficult peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement is a common challenge in pediatric patients.
  • Ultrasound guidance is known to decrease PIV placement attempts, but its adoption by attending anesthesiologists was low.
  • A need existed to improve PIV placement success rates and efficiency in pediatric anesthesiology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reduce the incidence of PIV placement requiring more than 3 attempts in pediatric patients.
  • To decrease the time required for PIV placement through targeted training.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of an ultrasound-guided PIV placement training program.

Main Methods:

  • An evidence-based difficult IV algorithm and ultrasound-guided PIV placement training were implemented for attending pediatric anesthesiologists.
  • Training included group sessions with simulation and individual operating room practice, monitored via a punch card system.
  • A cross-sectional analysis compared baseline data with post-training periods (December 2015–September 2019).

Main Results:

  • Cases requiring more than 3 PIV attempts decreased from 4.0% to 2.7% overall.
  • For patients 24 months or younger, attempts >3 decreased from 10% to 6.2%.
  • The time required to establish PIV access did not change significantly.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing a difficult IV algorithm and ultrasound training for pediatric anesthesiologists effectively reduced the number of PIV placement attempts.
  • The intervention did not significantly alter the time needed for PIV access.
  • Further strategies may be needed to address the time component of difficult PIV placement.