Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing change in longitudinal studies: adjusting for initial value.

W M Vollmer1

  • 1Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR 97215-1795.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tuberculosis control in a socially vulnerable area: a community intervention beyond DOT in a Brazilian favela.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2013
Same author

Tooth-surface-specific effects of xylitol: randomized trial results.

Journal of dental research·2013
Same author

Restricted spirometry in the Burden of Lung Disease Study.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2012
Same author

Efficacy of chlorhexidine varnish for the prevention of adult caries: a randomized trial.

Journal of dental research·2011
Same author

Quality of spirometry tests performed by 9893 adults in 14 countries: the BOLD Study.

Respiratory medicine·2011
Same author

Adolescent smokers are at greater risk for current asthma and rhinitis.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2009
Same journal

Harms Reporting Was Frequently Incomplete or Discordant in Biomedical Randomized Trials Published in 2023: A Meta-epidemiological Study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Using an Open Science Checklist in Grant Proposal Reviews to Predict Reproducibility of Funded Publications.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Adjusting for initial values can mislead when comparing population changes over time. This study introduces a method to correct regression to the mean bias, crucial for accurate longitudinal data analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Comparing changes over time between populations using initial values can be misleading.
  • Regression to the mean is a statistical phenomenon that can bias comparisons of change over time.
  • Standard adjustment methods may not adequately address these biases in certain study designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a methodology for correcting regression to the mean bias in longitudinal studies.
  • To examine the bias introduced by failing to correct for regression to the mean in two-sample comparisons.
  • To evaluate the implications of adjusting for initial values in observational studies where group assignment is related to baseline levels.

Main Methods:

  • Developing a regression-based methodology to adjust for regression to the mean.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying the method to analyze change over time in relation to standardized initial levels.
  • Utilizing data from a longitudinal study of lung function decline for illustration.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrating that adjustment for initial value can yield misleading results.
    • Quantifying the bias introduced by not correcting for regression to the mean.
    • Identifying specific conditions in observational studies where adjusting for initial value is inappropriate.

    Conclusions:

    • A novel methodology is presented to correct for regression to the mean in longitudinal data.
    • Failure to correct for regression to the mean can lead to significant bias in population comparisons.
    • Adjusting for initial values is inappropriate when group assignment is related to baseline measurements.