Equity analysis of Chinese physician allocation based on Gini coefficient and Theil index

Huimin Yu1, Shuangyan Yu2, Da He3

  • 1School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China.

Insights

Physician distribution in China is fair by population but highly unequal by service area. Addressing regional disparities in medical resources is crucial for equitable access to quality healthcare for all citizens.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Unequal medical physician resource allocation is a significant challenge in China and globally.
  • Current medical service management faces issues with equitable physician distribution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Analyze physician distribution across China's 31 provincial regions.
  • Evaluate the fairness of physician allocation based on population and service area.
  • Provide a theoretical foundation for improving physician resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the China Health Statistics Yearbook 2019 and National Bureau of Statistics.
  • Calculated Gini coefficients and Theil indices using Lorenz curves.
  • Assessed fairness of physician distribution by population and service area.

Main Results:

  • Physician distribution is fair by population (Gini=0.003), with minimal regional variation per 1000 people.
  • Distribution is highly unfair by service area (Gini=0.88), showing significant disparities per square kilometer.
  • Regions like Beijing, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Tianjin exceed the national average; some are over-provisioned.

Conclusions:

  • Reducing regional differences in physician numbers is essential for equitable resource allocation.
  • Measures are needed to decrease quality disparities and balance medical resources.
  • Improved allocation will enhance citizen access to quality medical services.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
79
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
351
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.9K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
897