Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Evaluating the informativeness of the Besag-York-Mollié CAR model
Harrison Quick1, Guangzi Song1, Loni Philip Tabb1
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University, 3215 Market Street,Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Abstract:
The use of the conditional autoregressive framework proposed by Besag, York, and Mollié (1991; BYM) is ubiquitous in Bayesian disease mapping and spatial epidemiology. While it is understood that Bayesian inference is based on a combination of the information contained in the data and the information contributed by the model, quantifying the contribution of the model relative to the information in the data is often non-trivial. Here, we provide a measure of the contribution of the BYM framework by first considering the simple Poisson-gamma setting in which quantifying the prior's contribution is quite clear. We then propose a relationship between gamma and lognormal priors that we then extend to cover the framework proposed by BYM. Following a brief simulation study in which we illustrate the accuracy of our lognormal approximation of the gamma prior, we analyze a dataset comprised of county-level heart disease-related death data across the United States. In addition to demonstrating the potential for the BYM framework to correspond to a highly informative prior specification, we also illustrate the sensitivity of death rate estimates to changes in the informativeness of the BYM framework.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

