Related Experiment Videos
Diagnosis of prosthetic aortic graft infection by magnetic resonance imaging
P A Olofsson1, W Auffermann, C B Higgins
1Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
Abstract:
The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of prosthetic aortic graft infection was evaluated in 18 patients with history and findings suggestive of this complication. The prospective interpretation of MRI was compared with surgical findings. Sixteen patients had a graft infection verified at operation. Fourteen patients had infection of the retroperitoneal portion of the graft; two patients had an infection limited to one of the groins; no graft infection was found at surgical exploration in the remaining two patients. Perigraft infection was correctly diagnosed on the basis of MRI findings in 14 of 16 cases; findings were false negative in one case, questionable in another case, and correctly excluded graft infection in two of two cases. MRI also defined the extent of infection in 14 of 16 cases. MRI findings that supported the clinical suspicion of graft infection were perigraft fluid collections remaining more than 3 months after surgery. Furthermore, local inflammation was suggested by an increased signal intensity of adjacent muscle on T2-weighted images in some cases. CT scans were performed in 12 patients; these enabled a correct diagnosis in five and provided indeterminate or false information in seven. These results indicate that MRI is helpful in the diagnosis of aortic graft infection. Furthermore, MRI provides information about the extent of infection crucial for planning therapy.
Insights
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accurately diagnoses prosthetic aortic graft infections. This imaging technique helps define infection extent, aiding crucial therapeutic planning for patients.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Prosthetic aortic graft infection is a serious complication.
- Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for prosthetic aortic graft infection.
- To compare MRI with surgical findings and CT scans.
Main Methods:
- Prospective evaluation of MRI in 18 patients with suspected graft infection.
- Comparison of MRI interpretation with surgical outcomes.
- CT scans were performed in 12 patients for comparison.
Main Results:
- MRI correctly diagnosed perigraft infection in 14 of 16 cases.
- MRI accurately defined the extent of infection in 14 of 16 cases.
- CT scans were less accurate, with correct diagnosis in only 5 of 12 patients.
Conclusions:
- MRI is a valuable tool for diagnosing prosthetic aortic graft infections.
- MRI provides crucial information on infection extent for treatment planning.
- MRI demonstrates superior accuracy compared to CT for this indication.