Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

5.9K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

190
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
190
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

376
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
376
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

897
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
897
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

218
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
218
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.5K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving Variance and Confidence Interval Estimation in Small-Sample Propensity Score Analyses: Bootstrap Versus Asymptotic Methods.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Remote Monitoring Approaches to Reduce Readmissions After Infection and Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Ivermectin for Critically and Noncritically Ill Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (REMAP-CAP).

Critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Latent Class Analysis Identifies Pulmonary Function Trajectory Phenotypes in Lung Transplant Recipients with Chronic Allograft Dysfunction.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Performance of PREVENT Cardiovascular Risk in Electronic Health Record-Based Clinical Practice.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Intermediate dose heparin thromboprophylaxis among critically ill patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K

Propensity score weighting for causal subgroup analysis.

Siyun Yang1, Elizabeth Lorenzi2, Georgia Papadogeorgou3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|May 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new causal inference methods for subgroup analysis in observational research, improving treatment effect estimation for specific patient groups. The developed tools enhance accuracy and visualization for subgroup causal effects.

Keywords:
balancing weightscausal inferencecovariate balanceeffect modificationinteractionoverlap weightspropensity scoresubgroup analysis

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.9K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.9K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Estimating treatment effects in specific patient subpopulations is crucial for comparative effectiveness research.
  • Existing causal inference methods for subgroup analysis (SGA) in observational studies are underdeveloped.
  • Accurate SGA is vital for personalized medicine and evidence-based healthcare decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate novel analytical methods and visualization tools for causal SGA in observational research.
  • To improve the estimation of treatment effects within prespecified patient subgroups.
  • To address limitations in existing methods for bias and variance in SGA.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of the subgroup weighted average treatment effect estimand and propensity score weighting estimator.
  • Application of overlap weighting (OW) for exact covariate balance within subgroups.
  • Combination of OW and LASSO for bias-variance tradeoff optimization in SGA.
  • Development of the Connect-S plot for visualizing subgroup covariate balance.

Main Results:

  • Balancing covariates within subgroups effectively bounds the bias of subgroup causal effect estimators.
  • The proposed OW and OW-LASSO methods demonstrate improved performance in simulations.
  • The Connect-S plot provides a useful tool for assessing covariate balance in SGA.
  • Simulation studies confirm the advantages of the proposed methods over existing approaches.

Conclusions:

  • The developed suite of methods and tools significantly advances causal SGA in observational studies.
  • The proposed techniques enhance the reliability and interpretability of subgroup treatment effect estimates.
  • These advancements have direct implications for improving patient care and comparative effectiveness research outcomes.