Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Sulfonylureas in the Current Practice of Type 2 Diabetes Management: Are They All the Same? Consensus from the Gulf
Yousef Al-Saleh1,2,3,4, Shaun Sabico5, Ahmed Al-Furqani6
1College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 22490, Saudi Arabia. salehy1@ngha.med.sa.
Abstract:
Since their inception in the commercial market in the mid-twentieth century, sulfonylureas (SUs) have remained a therapeutic option in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Despite their established glucose-lowering effects, there is no consensus among global experts and modern guidelines regarding the priority of SUs in relation to other therapeutic options, given the lack of evidence that SUs are associated with a low risk of macrovascular events and excess mortality. However, findings from recent trials and real-time observations have resolved this contentious issue somewhat, albeit to varying degrees. The present consensus discusses the role of SUs in contemporary diabetes management in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Regional experts from these countries gathered virtually to formulate a consensus following presentations of topics relevant to SU therapy with an emphasis on gliclazide, including long-term efficacy, cost, end-organ benefits, and side effects, based on up-to-date evidence. The present narrative review reflects the conclusions of this assembly and provides a platform upon which future guidelines for the use of SUs in the GCC can be tailored.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...

