Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A clinically feasible method for determining frequency resolution.

S A Davidson1, W Melnick

  • 1Ohio State University.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
|June 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Programmable Telecoil Responses: Potential Advantages for Assistive Listening Device Fittings.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Factors affecting axillary lymph node retrieval and assessment in breast cancer patients.

Annals of surgical oncology·2008
Same author

Topotecan concomitant with primary brachytherapy radiation in patients with cervical carcinoma: a phase I trial.

Gynecologic oncology·2001
Same author

Spontaneous arterial thrombosis with an advanced ovarian malignancy.

Gynecologic oncology·1997
Same author

Molar pregnancy in a 60-year-old woman.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·1997
Same author

Increased nephrotoxicity of combination taxol and cisplatin chemotherapy in gynecologic cancers as compared to cisplatin alone.

American journal of nephrology·1997
Same journal

Temporal resolution in infancy and subsequent language development.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Evidence of sensitivity to structural contrasts in the literature on children's language comprehension.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Narrative development in late talkers: early school age.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
See all related articles

Two methods for generating psychophysical tuning curves showed similar reliability for assessing frequency resolution in hearing abilities. However, the clinical method resulted in significantly more masking compared to the laboratory approach.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) are crucial for evaluating frequency resolution in hearing.
  • Assessing PTCs aids in understanding auditory processing in both normal and impaired hearing.
  • A detailed laboratory method and a simplified clinical method exist for PTC generation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the reliability and masking characteristics of a detailed laboratory method versus a clinical Bekesy method for generating PTCs.
  • To determine if the clinical method is a viable alternative for assessing frequency resolution in audiology.

Main Methods:

  • PTCs were generated using two distinct methods: a detailed laboratory procedure and a Bekesy method suitable for clinical settings.
  • Participants included individuals with normal hearing and those with hearing impairments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Key comparison metrics included method stability, amount of masking produced, and the pattern of masking functions.

    • Main Results:

    • Both the laboratory and clinical methods demonstrated equal reliability and repeatability for measuring frequency resolution, comparable to simple pure-tone thresholds.
    • The patterns of masking functions were consistent across both methods.
    • A significant difference was observed in the absolute amount of masking, with the clinical Bekesy method yielding higher values.

    Conclusions:

    • The clinical Bekesy method is a reliable alternative to the laboratory method for assessing frequency resolution.
    • While reliable, the clinical method produces more masking, which should be considered in clinical interpretation.
    • Further research may explore adjustments to the clinical method to align masking levels with laboratory findings.