Optimisation of total urinary aldosterone estimation: comparison with other laboratory methods for assessment of...

We have demonstrated that conventional methods for measuring total urinary aldosterone (TUA) may markedly and inconsistently underestimate aldosterone output, since under the conditions usually employed (pH 1.0), the hydrolysis of aldosterone conjugates in urine is incomplete. The use of more acidic hydrolysis conditions (pH 0.2) overcomes this problem. However free aldosterone may be damaged at this pH. Therefore to accurately measure TUA output, it is necessary to isolate the undamaged aldosterone chromatographically and to correct for procedural losses based on the recovery of aldosterone tracer added to the urine prior to hydrolysis. We compared a number of laboratory estimates of aldosterone status (including urinary free aldosterone) with the 24-h urinary sodium output in normal subjects, since this provides a good bioassay of aldosterone. Sodium output correlated best with "optimised" 24 h TUA, i.e. hydrolysed at pH 0.2, (r = -0.589, P less than 0.001), and with plasma aldosterone (r = -0.504, P less than 0.005). Both aldosterone in random urine specimens and plasma renin activity correlated poorly with 24-h sodium output. Therefore, while the measurement of optimised TUA excretion provides the best index of aldosterone activity, assay of aldosterone in random specimens of plasma, which is more convenient for patient and laboratory, may be adequate for many clinical purposes.