Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

07:57
Sampling and Pretreatment of Tooth Enamel Carbonate for Stable Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Analysis
Published on: August 15, 2018
14.3K
Evaluating machine learning techniques for archaeological lithic sourcing: a case study of flint in Britain
Tom Elliot1, Robert Morse2, Duane Smythe3
1Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, 12-14 Abercromby Square, Liverpool, L69 7WZ, UK. t.elliot@liverpool.ac.uk.
Scientific Reports
|May 14, 2021
Summary
Geochemical sourcing of stone artefacts has advanced with machine learning. This study evaluates Random Forest, K-Nearest-Neighbour, and Support Vector Machines, presenting a robust pipeline for accurate artefact analysis.
Area of Science:
- Archaeological science
- Geochemistry
- Computational archaeology
Background:
- Geochemical sourcing of stone artefacts has evolved significantly since 1970s research.
- Recent advances in instrumentation, data analysis, and machine learning have spurred global interest.
- Variability in the application quality of these advanced techniques necessitates robust evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an objective evaluation of popular machine learning techniques for geochemical sourcing of artefacts.
- To present a standardized pipeline for the appropriate application of these methods.
- To improve upon previous approaches by reducing bias and enhancing evaluation metrics.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a case study of flint artefacts and geological samples from England.
- Evaluated three machine learning techniques: Random Forest, K-Nearest-Neighbour, and Support Vector Machines.
- Developed and applied a robust pipeline for objective model evaluation, including F1 Score measurement.
Main Results:
- Achieved high model classification performance when techniques were evaluated correctly.
- Random Forest demonstrated the highest average accuracy at 85% (F1 Score).
- Support Vector Machines also showed strong performance, closely following Random Forest.
Conclusions:
- The developed methodology offers significant improvements over previous artefact sourcing approaches.
- The pipeline effectively mitigates bias and provides enhanced means for evaluating geochemical sourcing models.
- This approach enhances the reliability and objectivity of sourcing stone artefacts using geochemical data and machine learning.

