Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

329
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
329
Ribosome Profiling02:24

Ribosome Profiling

3.8K
Ribosome profiling or ribo-sequencing is a deep sequencing technique that produces a snapshot of active translation in a cell. It selectively sequences the mRNAs protected by ribosomes to get an insight into a cell’s translation landscape at any given point in time.
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...
3.8K
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

14.6K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
14.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimal dismantling of directed networks.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Tumor transcriptional state predicts survival in immune-checkpoint-blockade-treated glioblastoma.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

Quantum ensembling methods for healthcare and life science.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Tumor transcriptional state predicts survival in immune-checkpoint-blockade-treated glioblastoma.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

A ferritin-based mosaic-like nanovaccine elicits effective cross-protection against H1N1 and H3N2 swine influenza viruses.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026
Same author

Machine learning-based Personalized Dietary Recommendations to Achieve Desired Gut Microbial Compositions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

ClairS: a deep-learning method for long-read tumor-normal pair somatic small variant calling.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Spatio-DARLIN enables robust and efficient in situ lineage tracing in mice at single-cell resolution.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

EasyGrid: a versatile platform for automated cryo-EM sample preparation and quality control.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Cloud-based microscope enables live neuroimaging for 24 h and beyond with worldwide access.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Deep molecular profiling in three dimensions.

Nature methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

13.1K

Challenges in benchmarking metagenomic profilers.

Zheng Sun1, Shi Huang2,3, Meng Zhang4

  • 1Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Nature Methods
|May 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Distinguishing between relative sequence abundance and relative taxonomic abundance is critical when evaluating metagenomic profilers. Neglecting this difference can lead to misleading conclusions in microbiome research.

More Related Videos

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
09:52

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease

Published on: January 10, 2025

926
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

30.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

13.1K
A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
09:52

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease

Published on: January 10, 2025

926
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

30.5K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Accurate microbial identification and abundance estimation are fundamental to metagenomics.
  • Numerous metagenomic profilers exist for taxonomic profiling and data classification.
  • Benchmarking these profilers is complicated by differing abundance reporting methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the impact of distinguishing between relative sequence abundance and relative taxonomic abundance in metagenomic profiler benchmarking.
  • To demonstrate how interchanging these abundance types can skew results.
  • To guide the microbiome research community towards more accurate profiler evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of metagenomic profiler outputs.
  • Evaluation of abundance data types (sequence vs. taxonomic).
  • Assessment of the influence on per-sample statistics and cross-sample comparisons.

Main Results:

  • Neglecting the distinction between sequence and taxonomic abundance leads to misleading conclusions.
  • Interchanging abundance types significantly affects summary statistics and comparative analyses.
  • The choice of abundance metric impacts the interpretation of metagenomic data.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must carefully consider and clearly state the abundance data type used when benchmarking metagenomic profilers.
  • Attention to abundance type is essential to avoid erroneous biological interpretations.
  • Standardized reporting of abundance metrics will improve the reliability of metagenomic studies.