Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025
Cryopreservation of Mouse Embryos by Ethylene Glycol-Based Vitrification
Published on: November 18, 2011
Vitrification of Mouse Blastocysts by Open or Closed System and Warming in Sucrose-containing or Sucrose-free Diluent
D Garza1, M Camacho2, M Gauly3
1Department of Animal Science, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Goettingen, Germany. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Francisco Villa S/N, 66050, Escobedo, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Background:
Cryopreservation of embryos is of considerable relevance for the implementation of embryo transfer programs and the establishment of embryo banks in several mammalian species.
Objective:
The present investigation compares two different vitrification systems and two different warming solutions.
Materials And Methods:
Vitrification was performed using Open Pulled Straw (OPS) or CVM RingFibre plug (CVM) devices. Warming was carried out either in a warming solution containing 0.33 M sucrose or in a solution devoid of sucrose.
Results:
Differences between vitrification systems were not significant. Warming in sucrose-containing diluent resulted in an expansion rate of 64%, as compared to 86% in a solution devoid of sucrose; reported hatching rates were 45% vs. 9%, respectively (p<0.05). Upon transfer, implantation rates for OPS- and CVM were 50% and 27%, respectively, compared with 55% for freshly collected embryos. The implantation rate after warming was 43% for sucrose-containing and 33% for sucrose-free medium.
Conclusion:
a) both vitrification systems are suitable for vitrifying mouse blastocysts; b) warming in sucrose-free diluent yields better embryo survival rates than in diluent containing 0.33 M sucrose.
