Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for measuring reaction time.

D A Crabtree1, L R Antrim

  • 1Neurobehavioral Health Promotion and Human Performance, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0022.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|April 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analysis of strength and endurance in fast twitch skeletal muscle after an acute in vitro exposure to an anabolic steroid.

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness·1991
Same author

Differences in the technical and applied nutrition knowledge of older adults.

Journal of nutrition for the elderly·1990
Same author

Racial and gender composition of health education faculty in higher education.

Health education·1989
Same author

Difference in rural and urban mortality: implications for health education and promotion.

The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association·1988
Same author

Reconsideration of measurement of error in human motor learning.

Perceptual and motor skills·1988
Same author

Transfer of sensory-integration training.

Perceptual and motor skills·1987

This study highlights crucial factors often overlooked in reaction time assessments, offering 20 recommendations to improve the reliability of neurological function testing.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Reaction time is a key indicator of neurological function.
  • Current assessment protocols may be compromised by unaddressed extraneous variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss critical factors influencing reaction time measurements.
  • To provide practical recommendations for improving the validity of reaction time assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and expert discussion on instrumentation, subject control, assessment design, and data interpretation.
  • Development of a checklist of 20 recommendations.

Main Results:

  • Identified numerous extraneous factors that can affect reaction time validity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulated 20 specific recommendations for standardized and reliable testing.

    • Conclusions:

    • Adherence to standardized protocols is essential for accurate neurological function assessment.
    • The provided recommendations serve as a valuable guide for researchers and clinicians in reaction time testing.