Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

11:35
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
58.3K
Innovative Medical Technology and the Treatment Decision-Making Process in Multiple Sclerosis: A Focus Group Study to
L A Visser1, M De Mul2, W K Redekop1
1Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Patient Preference and Adherence
|May 17, 2021
Summary
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) face treatment uncertainty. Patients are open to a new implantable device for MS, provided safety and efficacy are guaranteed, offering potential for greater disease control.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Medical Technology
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) aim to reduce disease progression and relapse frequency.
- Current MS treatment administration includes oral, injectable, and infusion methods, complicating patient decision-making.
- A novel implantable device for MS treatment is under development, but patient perspectives remain unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To understand the patient perspective on the treatment decision-making process in multiple sclerosis (MS).
- To explore patient attitudes and potential acceptance of an implantable device for MS treatment.
Main Methods:
- Focus groups were conducted with individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) in the Netherlands.
- Discussions covered treatment decision-making, the current treatment landscape, and attitudes toward an implantable device.
- An online survey quantified interest in the implantable device among MS patients.
Main Results:
- A key theme was the persistent uncertainty MS patients experience regarding treatment decisions (initiation, cessation, modification).
- Focus group participants (n=16) and survey respondents (n=93) showed general positivity towards the implantable device concept.
- Patients emphasized the necessity of guaranteed efficacy and safety for the implantable MS treatment.
Conclusions:
- Individuals with MS desire enhanced control over their disease and treatment journey.
- Implantable devices represent a potential advancement in the MS treatment landscape, possibly gaining patient acceptance.
- Early patient engagement in the design process is crucial for the success of new medical technologies in MS care.

