Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Use of Ultra-high Field MRI in Small Rodent Models of Polycystic Kidney Disease for In Vivo Phenotyping and Drug Monitoring
Published on: June 23, 2015
Radiographic Imaging in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Claims Analysis
Myrlene Sanon Aigbogun1, Robert A Stellhorn1, Christina S Pao1
1Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Background:
Progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is highly variable, with some patients progressing rapidly to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Abdominal imaging is an important modality for verifying diagnosis in patients at risk for rapidly progressing ADPKD, targeting them for early treatment that could slow onset of ESRD. Published literature is limited on the real-world abdominal imaging utilization patterns in ADPKD.
Methods:
A retrospective healthcare administrative claims analysis examining abdominal imaging scans occurring from January 1, 2014, through June 30, 2017, was conducted using the IBM MarketScan® commercial and Medicare supplemental databases. Patients in the United States who were at least 18 years old and had at least 1 inpatient claim or 2 outpatient claims (with different dates of service) with an ADPKD diagnosis code, as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM codes 753.12 [polycystic kidney, unspecified type] and 753.13 [polycystic kidney, autosomal dominant] and/or Tenth Revision (ICD-10-CM codes Q61.2 [polycystic kidney, adult type] and Q61.3 [polycystic kidney, unspecified]) were included.
Results:
Of the 4637 patients with ADPKD (mean age, 51.2 years [SD = 15.52]), 59% had ≥1 abdominal imaging scan. Of these patients, 46% had ≥1 computed tomography (CT) scan, 25% had ≥1 ultrasound, 10% had ≥1 magnetic resonance imaging scan. Among the 1754 patients (38%) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage information, CT imaging was more frequent in later stages (31% stage 1 versus 68% stage 5). The proportion of patients undergoing at least 1 CT or MRI scan increased with disease severity (37% in stage 1, 42% in stage 2, 48% in stage 3, 56% in stage 4, and 71% in stage 5).
Conclusion:
Results of this analysis support the need for further investigation into abdominal imaging utilization in managing patients with ADPKD. Future research could clarify barriers and increase access to imaging, which has the potential to inform risk stratification, help patients delay dialysis or transplantation associated with ESRD, and help health systems avoid the costs associated with ESRD.
More Related Videos
08:46Implementing Patch Clamp and Live Fluorescence Microscopy to Monitor Functional Properties of Freshly Isolated PKD Epithelium
Published on: September 1, 2015
12:47Spectral Karyotyping to Study Chromosome Abnormalities in Humans and Mice with Polycystic Kidney Disease
Published on: February 3, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography