Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Considering Performance in the Automated and Manual Coding of Sociolinguistic Variables: Lessons From Variable (ING)
Tyler Kendall1, Charlotte Vaughn1,2, Charlie Farrington1,3
1Linguistics Department, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Automated methods show promise for coding sociolinguistic variables like English (ING) pronunciation. However, expect variability even with human-coded data, highlighting the need for careful validation in language variation studies.
Area of Science:
- Sociolinguistics
- Computational Linguistics
- Speech Processing
Background:
- Impressionistic coding of sociolinguistic variables, such as English (ING) pronunciation, is crucial for language variation and change studies.
- Automating sociolinguistic data analysis has advanced, but coding features like (ING) without clear acoustic correlates lags behind other phonetic features.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore computational methods for automatically coding variable (ING) pronunciation in speech recordings.
- To compare automated coding performance with human coders and assess the impact on linguistic and social factor analyses.
Main Methods:
- Utilized automatic speech recognition (ASR) procedures, specifically forced alignment with the Montreal Forced Aligner.
- Employed supervised machine learning algorithms, including linear and radial support vector machines, and random forests.
- Assessed algorithm performance through agreement with human coders and impact on sociolinguistic analysis outcomes.
Main Results:
- Automated coding methods demonstrate potential for analyzing sociolinguistic variables like (ING).
- Variability in results is expected, even with meticulously human-coded data, underscoring the importance of robust validation.
- Baseline performance data for both automated and manual coding methods were established.
Conclusions:
- Automated coding of sociolinguistic variables like (ING) is feasible and promising.
- Further research is needed to establish "gold standards" for training and testing automated procedures.
- The study provides valuable baseline data and highlights considerations for integrating automated methods into sociolinguistic research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

