Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Implementation of Crisis-Resource-Management-based Team Training in Lower Austria
Helmut Trimmel1,2, Daniel Csomor1, Martina Seedoch1
1Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine and Karl Landsteiner Institute of Medical Simulation, Patient Safety and Emergency Medicine, General Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
This article reviews the decade-long implementation of simulation-based team training for medical staff in Lower Austrian hospitals. By focusing on non-technical skills, the program successfully improved patient safety and became a sustainable, cost-effective model for large-scale hospital systems.
Area of Science:
- Patient safety research within Crisis-Resource-Management clinical education
- Health services administration and organizational management
Background:
Medical errors frequently lead to negative outcomes in acute care settings. Human factors often contribute to these preventable events. Prior research has shown that non-technical skills significantly influence team performance during emergencies. This gap motivated the development of specialized educational programs. No prior work had resolved how to scale such training across large regional hospital networks. That uncertainty drove the establishment of a simulation-based initiative in Lower Austria. Prior efforts often lacked long-term sustainability data. This study addresses the need for longitudinal analysis of such institutionalized training models.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study is to describe the implementation and development of simulation-based training for medical staff. This research examines the organizational aspects of a decade-long program in a large hospital network. The authors seek to analyze the costs and performance data associated with this educational initiative. This work addresses the challenge of reducing human-factor-based errors in acute care environments. The researchers intend to highlight the methodology used to institutionalize non-technical skill development. By reviewing the program history, the study explores how to sustain such efforts over time. The team also aims to show how these activities triggered broader improvements in patient safety. This investigation provides a comprehensive look at the feasibility of large-scale clinical training models.
Main Methods:
The review approach involved a retrospective analysis of a ten-year implementation period for team education. Researchers examined financial records and performance metrics from the regional hospital operator. The team documented the organizational structure and methodology used to deliver the curriculum. They tracked the expansion of simulation facilities, including the acquisition of eight manikins and advanced monitoring equipment. The investigators also cataloged various patient safety activities initiated alongside the primary training. Data collection covered the period from 2008 to the present day. The study evaluated the impact of the non-profit association model on instructor availability. Finally, the authors synthesized findings regarding the total project expenditures and participant engagement levels.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature show that over 2,300 doctors and nurses completed the courses during the decade. The total project cost was reported at just under 2,000,000 euros. Initial funding for the initiative was 100,000 euros provided by the holding group. Course fees ranged from 350 to 500 euros per participant. Fourteen qualified trainers delivered the curriculum across various hospital and simulation settings. The program successfully expanded to include high-fidelity ventilation and monitoring capabilities. The analysis confirms that the training was sustainably institutionalized within the hospital network. The results demonstrate that the demand for these educational opportunities remained consistently high throughout the study period.
Conclusions:
The authors report that simulation-based training was successfully introduced and institutionalized across the regional hospital group. High demand and strong acceptance from staff characterized the program over the decade. The researchers propose that the independent, non-profit organizational structure supported long-term viability. This model allowed instructors to maintain their clinical roles while delivering high-quality education. The team suggests that these training efforts effectively fostered broader patient safety initiatives. The study highlights that total project costs remained relatively low over the ten-year period. The findings indicate that such programs can be sustained without compromising clinical staffing availability. The authors conclude that this approach serves as a viable framework for large-scale healthcare systems.
Frequently Asked Questions
The researchers propose that the program improves patient safety by enhancing non-technical skills, which mitigates human-factor-based errors. This mechanism is supported by the integration of simulation-based training alongside specific safety protocols like OR checklists and anaesthesia briefings.
The program utilizes high-fidelity ventilation and monitoring simulation, alongside eight different manikins. These tools allow for realistic practice in both dedicated simulation centers and actual hospital environments, facilitating versatile learning experiences for the participants.
The authors state that an independent, non-profit registered association was necessary to sustain the program. This structure allowed instructors to deliver training without reducing their availability for clinical duties, ensuring the hospital system remained fully staffed.
The trainers used retrospective cost and performance data collected over a ten-year period. This quantitative information allowed the team to analyze the financial sustainability and reach of the initiative across the large hospital network.
The program reached approximately 1,900 co-workers initially, with over 2,300 doctors and nurses participating in courses over a decade. This high level of engagement demonstrates the strong demand for and acceptance of the training among clinical staff.
The researchers propose that the program provides a scalable framework for other large hospital operators. They suggest that the combination of low relative costs and high staff acceptance makes this model a sustainable approach for improving safety culture.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV

